1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Yanka [14]
3 years ago
15

How might hammurabi argue that laws 215 and 218 were just .

History
2 answers:
Olegator [25]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Law 215:

Specialists receive pay for protecting living of people by serving on them.

Law 218:

If the surgeon has become a cause for his patient's death, his hands shall be cut off.

Explanation:

Approximately 4,000 years before, one man called Hammurabi became the leader of a little city-state named Babylon. Now Babylon survives just like an archaeological locality in inside Iraq. Lately, in Hammurabi's time, it was the capital of that state of Babylonia.

anygoal [31]3 years ago
3 0

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

King Hammurabi might argue that laws 215 and 218 were just because they tried to save a person's life.

Both laws refer to surgeons. If they saved a person's life, they had to receive 10 shekels of silver. But if the person died, their hands should be cut off. A little drastic, but that was Hammurabis's ideas.

Hammurabi was the King of Babylon for 42 years, according to some tablets written in cuneiform scripts found by archeologists in the site. In the year 38th of his rule, Hammurabi set a code of laws known as the Hammurabi code that was carved in a big stele. It was a code with 282 laws. Many of the laws protected the weak from the strong.

You might be interested in
What scenario best fits president Wilson’s fourteen points vision
tino4ka555 [31]
Germany and Austria determine how their governments should run <span />
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
36. The battle of Vicksburg
zhuklara [117]
B is the answer I think
6 0
3 years ago
Is it more accurate to say that the Texas governor is the state’s “chief persuader” than to say that he or she is the “chief exe
SCORPION-xisa [38]
Add me on ig BhadBharbhie_2020
8 0
3 years ago
The Articles of Confederation lacked the power to tax?
Annette [7]
Yes they did because they did not have a government the power only came from the states
7 0
3 years ago
The what were special strike forces charged with the task of rounding up and killing jews
muminat
The Einsatzgruppen were used by the military to gather Jews nearing the end of the war
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which form of government is China?
    8·2 answers
  • world war 1 left Germany feeling? a.unfairly punished, b.eager to make friends, c.content with the peace treaties, d.good in the
    5·1 answer
  • A powerful committee of the U.S. Senate charged with finding ways to raise federal revenues is the
    6·2 answers
  • The Edict of Nantes guaranteed freedom to the _________ of France.
    6·1 answer
  • Which of these was not a result of the Red Scare?
    8·2 answers
  • What tune was played at Polk's inauguration and has been played ever since?
    10·1 answer
  • Can someone help me please
    9·1 answer
  • What is the best part of the world​
    12·2 answers
  • Why is agriculture in Africa important
    5·1 answer
  • The Soviet Union's communist government was different from Nazi
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!