Technically, no, it is false that religious <span>freedom was encouraged in the Puritan colony of Massachusetts, since although the Puritans were seeking religious freedom for themselves, they generally did not tolerate other religions (ironically). </span>
They were both the leaders of two nations very closely allied. They had a common enemy in the world wars. They would most likely help each other in war time.
Stable regions of the craton where shields are covered by sedimentary rocks are called platforms.
Precambrian rocks are often called basement rocks because they lie beneath a covering of fossil-bearing sedimentary strata.
Various Precambrian provinces can be delineated within the North American continent, based on radiometric ages of rocks, style of folding, and differences in trends of faults and folds.
hope it helps
Answer:
it afforded greater long-term security
Explanation:
<em> it offered more opportunities for job training </em>– this is not the correct answer. Slave apologists from the west didn’t care much for job training opportunities.
<em>it afforded greater long-term security</em> – <u>this is the correct answer. Southerners who apologized slavery thought slaves actually benefited from this way of life where someone offers them control</u>, plan for life, and structured job.<u> In their ideas, slaves would be lost, frightened, even irresponsible if they had freedom. By enslaving them, they believed they gave them security and stability.</u> This kind of life, they argued, is better than workers who had jobs and freedom in the North, as slaves had proper care and protection.
<em>it was actually a "freer" relationship</em> – this is not the correct answer. The southern apologists didn’t claim slaves were freer in this type of relationship, just that it was better for them.
<em>it included women in the workforce </em>– this is not the case. The problem of women's work rights was not mentioned at the time.