The correct answer is:
The Senate could prevent the President's nominee from serving as a federal judge, if they refuse to confirm the President's nominee.
Explanation:
Under Article II, of the United States Constitution; the President has the power to elect candidates for Supreme Court Judges, but it also states that the Senate shall advice and consent the President's decision.
Before the President can officially present his nominee, he has to follow certain steps that involve sessions in which the nominee should present and answer questions from the Senate's Judiciary Committee. The Committee acts as a Representative Committee for the whole Senate, and if they approve (three-fifths are required), they send their vote to the entire Senate, this confirmation allows the President to appoint the nominee for federal judge.
Answer:
Generally cities cause people to become more liberal, have a social hierarchy, and promote the general abundance of transportation.
Explanation:
Socially, you can have tenements form, races can self and forcefully segregate, and people tend to become more liberal with exposure to other races.
Cultural is kind of related. People tend to clump into ideological groups (if you can give me the context of the question I can better answer).
Political life, like I said they tend to become more liberal. If your question is centered around the 1920's you could discuss child labor laws.
Answer:
British attempts to limit western expansion by colonists and inadvertent provocation of a major Indian war further angered the British subjects living in the American colonies. These disputes ultimately spurred colonial rebellion, which eventually developed into a full-scale war for independence.
Explanation:
Brainlest, Please!
<span>"they have promoted the expansion of this power by consistently ruling that the meaning of commerce, whether international or interstate. Its exceeding just by buying and selling goods."
hope this helps!</span>
Answer: I would support this endeavor, because we are running out of resources on Earth. Colonizing Mars would also open up new jobs on and off Earth. Some would argue that we could better spend that money on helping save our planet rather the colonizing a new one. I would have to say good luck, getting the oil executives and other current un-renewable energy executives to sign up for that one. It would take hundreds of years and more money to switch from where we are now to completely renewable. Also the benefits of the scientific boom from that kind of money being put into those programs would be enormous, and not just in the space exploration. It would also help just about every other scientific field as well.
Explanation:
