Answer:
It stressed the independence of each state and guaranteed the protection of slavery.
Explanation:
Answer:
The winner-take-all system of the Electoral College makes it possible for a candidate who loses the popular vote to win the electoral vote, and a strong third-party candidate could win enough electoral votes to prevent either major-party candidate from receiving a majority of votes.
Explanation:
Most critics against the Electoral College state as one of their primary reasons the idea of the winner-take-all system allowing a candidate who has lost the popular vote to still win the electoral vote. Furthermore, they claim that a powerful third-party candidate could not only pull votes away from the major candidates but also bargain their way into the Electoral College.
Answer:
Soft money
Explanation:
Soft money can be understood from the sobriquet, 'soft'. It is more or less a paper money. This is a well used fund in varying political circles. Thus, political parties can receive these funds and/or contributions from businesses and/or organization that are not regulated by the Federal Election Commission.
The implication of the non regulation by the Federal Election Commission is that there will be no limits as to the levels and degree of contributions that could be made.
The idea of soft money hinges on a fundamental human rights of free speech. As such, unnecessary influence is often eliminated in a bid to fulfil the rules that apply to such donations. The money are often made to political parties or individuals via direct or proxy routes.
<span>industrialized because they were developing factories</span>
Answer:
Constantine made Christianity legal.
Explanation:
