Answer:
Option "C" is correct
Explanation:
Although we were impressed with your application, we have no positions available at this time.
The statement depicts that the situation hass been decided even before the current circumstances.
Answer:
1. "But the process proved to be much more difficult than de Sacy had anticipated . . . Eventually, he gave up, saying, 'The problem is too complicated, scientifically insoluble.' " Yes
2. "The scholars labeled the slab the 'Rosetta Stone' in honor of the place where it was found, and called in their language experts to examine it." No
3. "These were impressive achievements. But Akerblad's success in identifying so many demotic characters now led him to make a serious mistake." Yes
Explanation:
In literary writings, a conflict is a struggle between two opposing forces. There could be; conflict with oneself, conflict with others, conflict with the environment, and conflict with supernatural forces.
- The first sentence above indicates a conflict or struggle between a person (de Sacy) and a complicated problem.
- The second sentence indicates no apparent struggle between two opposing forces.
- The third sentence expresses a conflict between Akerblad and his innate ability to identify demotic characters.
Answer:
Darcy is feeling scared.
Explanation:
The following day, Elizabeth takes a walk and runs into Darcy, who gives her a letter. He walks away, and Elizabeth begins to read it. In the letter, Darcy again admits to attempting to break Bingley’s romance with Jane, but he defends himself by arguing that Jane’s attachment to his friend was not yet strong enough to lead to heartbreak. He adds that he did not wish Bingley to involve himself with the social encumbrance of marrying into the Bennet family, with its lack of both wealth and propriety. In relation to Wickham, the letter states that Darcy did provide for him after his father’s death and that the root of their quarrel lay in an attempt by Wickham to elope with Darcy’s sister, Georgiana, in the hopes of obtaining her fortune.
The claim that was made by Rachel Carson at the beginning of the video is that "if were are ever to solve the basic problem that comes with contamination, we must begin to count the many costs of what we are doing"
In the above she claimed that pesticide were doing a lot of damage to the environment. This claim was expressed fully in her book: Silent Spring.
<h3>What support does Carson provide for her claim?</h3>
To support her claim, she indicated that there were a lot of associated carcinogenic and effects resulting form tumors.
Here are the points Carson made:
- That the Chemicals irradiative and that they are modifying the way the world eco-system.
- That it it was impossible to lay down such a barrage of poisons on the surface of the earth without making it unfit for all life
- That the chemicals should not be called 'insecticides' but 'biocides'.
<h3>What claim is made by the chemical engineer? </h3>
The chemical engineer Mr. Robert White-Stevens claimed her suggestion that pesticides are destroying life are exaggerated and a distortion of actual facts.
According to the engineers, the real threat was not chemical but biological and that the threat was the insects that ravage the supply of food made for man and transmit diseases.
<h3>What appears on screen while the chemical industry representative is making his argument?</h3>
Images of insects flying all around perched on kids and on people were the images that was flashed on the screen as the chemical engineers made his counterclaim.
Learn more about claim:
brainly.com/question/2748145
#SPJ1
