Answer:
D
Explanation:
Because you still have to pay the same amount of taxes.
Answer:
See explanation section
Explanation:
a) Implementing an urban planning project is an example of speculative risk. There is a huge uncertainty before implementing a project as well as after its implementation regarding its gross outcomes. Projects of any type can completely fail. But there are some cases that they succeed; they may spawn some positive outcomes for a specific community. In any project, there is always a probability of both gain and loss.
b) There are a lot of possible adverse outcomes of this type of risk. Maybe the project is not running sustainably. The ground condition may not be suitable afterward, but inclement weather can reduce the desired project utilitarian. It can attribute an adverse impact on the present environment. Assume that the budget cross before the implementation of that project. Finally, these sorts of adverse outcomes may result in the project’s failure.
c) Project risk can also beget some positive outcomes. In this type of threat, after implementation of that project, it may run sustainably. The ground and atmospheric conditions may appear suitable for this specific project. The approved budget may consider sufficient for the project implementation. That is how; these sorts of positive outcomes may result in the project’s success.
d) These types of risks, both positive and negative, may create unexpected expenses. If we think about the real risks, to manage these risks, we should exploit, share and enhance the specific risk, And in case of managing the harmful risks, we should transfer into a better resource-based project or try to mitigate the negative impacts of the project. Both of these efforts can be considered as unexpected expenses.
e) To protect myself against the real risks, I’ll exploit the specific risk. Because operating the risk is about increasing the chances of positive effects, the risk may have on the project. But if it is about the detrimental risks, I’ll try to avoid the risks by doing some activities like delegating tasks, changing the deadline, and increasing the human resources of the project team.
Answer:
Complete the presentation and extra work themselves; in the future, the individual will have to remember to send everything or risk doing the extra work themselves.
Explanation:
Not only this helps in increasing accountability in the individual but it would also help in influencing the behavior of the individual in the future. He would be more responsible for delegating the tasks as he would learn from his mistakes. This would go a long way in developing a competent and responsible workforce which would help in increasing the effecency of the company.
Answer:
d.No effect on the expenses of the current period.
Explanation:
In the case when the credit balance of the allowance for doubtful debt more than the bad debt amount i.e. written off
So the entry for writing off against the allowance would result in no effect on the expense for the present period
As the bad debt expense is debited and the allowance for doubtful debt would be credited therefore the option d is correct
Answer:
The answer is B. $180,000
Explanation:
The sum of years' digits method is an accelerated depreciation that is based on the assumption that the productivity of the asset decreases with time.
Here, the sum of the digits are found. In this question, useful life is 5 years. So the sum of the digit is:
5+4+3+2+1 = 15.
April 1 20X4 through March 31 20X6 is 2 years.
First year depreciation is:
5/15 x $300,000
=$100,000
2nd year depreciation is:
4/15 x $300,000
=$80,000
Therefore, accumulated depreciation is
$100,000 + $80,000
$180,000
