1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
MA_775_DIABLO [31]
3 years ago
11

how are the federalists and anti-federlist debates still relevant today? please use real life examples (court cases etc.)​

History
1 answer:
Alla [95]3 years ago
4 0

The federalists wanted a constitution that would be able to defend citizens from abuses of power. But they saw no incompatibility between individual rights and the formation of a minimally structured central power to confront the complex problems. In opposition were the anti-federalists ,  they insisted that states should be free and independent and saw the creation of the United States as a new form of tyranny.

This is important to show how the US can be free and democratic about the opinions.

You might be interested in
How did Catholic leaders encourage change during the Catholic Reformation?
Yuki888 [10]

B. Through a return to community service

edge 2022

5 0
2 years ago
Can someone please help me with this
Fantom [35]
Can’t see the picture
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
It is a real privilege to greet you and tell you in this way about changing patterns for women workers in the United States. […]
OverLord2011 [107]
She is <span>enthusiastic. I hope this helps. :)</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How were rushlights different from candles
adell [148]

Answer:A rush-candle is an ordinary candle (a block or cylinder of tallow or wax) that uses a piece of rush as a wick. Rushlights, by contrast, are strips of plant fiber impregnated with tallow or grease. The wick is not separate from the fuel in a rushlight.

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
What was the key to civilization that greatly affected native american culture?
Serjik [45]
There is no key to civilization. The concept that native americans did not have a civilization or were not civilized is one only supported by the egotism and arrogance of the empirical profit oriented "conquerers" who have worked to eradicate all cultures that conflict with profits. The key to western civilization that allowed them to kill off the majority of the natives was a lack of respect for life and insane drive for control, ownership and dominance, to which the peaceful and sophisticated Natives would not stoop. 
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why did many americans oppose getting involved in world war two?
    7·1 answer
  • The hollywood production code of 1930 began to be seriously enforced by:
    14·1 answer
  • Why did the merchant in the american colonies start smuggling gods?
    11·1 answer
  • What is the length of ab?
    7·2 answers
  • Why were the middle colonies called the breadbasket colonies?
    12·1 answer
  • What might account for the location of these early colonial settlements?
    6·2 answers
  • What types of persecution did the Roma face before, during, and after the Holocaust?
    8·1 answer
  • How has patriotism been used as a weapon in the past? Be specific and verbose
    9·1 answer
  • Please select the word from the list that best fits the definition
    5·2 answers
  • 300 / 2(0.5 + 4.5)^2 show your work
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!