1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Irina18 [472]
3 years ago
9

Read the excerpt from part two of Trifles.

English
2 answers:
Afina-wow [57]3 years ago
8 0
In this play, the attorney is trying to find out what happened to Mr. Wright and how he died (apparently strangled, but suspected murdered). Mrs. Peters finds the bird, that was supposed to be in the bird cage, strangled. She interprets this as the preparation to the killing of Mr. Wright and hides the bird in a box. The fact that the ladies in the scene have agreed to not disclose the contents of the box and continue to hide it, let us know that the best answer here is option C.
erica [24]3 years ago
4 0
C. The women are going to hide what they have discovered to protect Mrs. Wright.
You might be interested in
Question 3 of 5
Lostsunrise [7]

Cruel best describes the narrator's father according to the  narrator.

c. Cruel

<u>Explanation:</u>

"Native Son" is a novel by African American creator Richard Wright. In it, he recounts to the account of Bigger Thomas, who is an African American youth living in Chicago during the 1930s. The storyteller is portrayed as an individual that is unsociable, a horrendous individual, that can't collaborate well with others, possibly somewhat modest, this can be comprehended due to his issues as a dark man and how bigotry influenced him every single through hey life. He was, for the most part, furious, and simultaneously, he had the option to get the consideration of individuals.

8 0
4 years ago
How do tributaries compare in size with the body of water they flow into
dmitriy555 [2]
Whatever they saiddddddddddd
4 0
3 years ago
Which parts of this passage from chapter 6 of Emily Brontë's Wuthering Heights show that Hindley Earnshaw did not care about the
Viefleur [7K]

so i wanna start off with saying it asks for three lines ok and the other guy here who put answers only gave you two lines and they are both wrong

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Identify , In lines 17-20, Lincoln says that one party "would make war" while the other "would accept war" To whom was Lincoln r
BlackZzzverrR [31]
The party that "would make war" is the Confederacy. The party that "would accept war" is the Union. The tone of Lincoln's second inaugural address is subdued and weary. He states that the war has gone longer than it should. In this sentence he assigns both parties a responsibility for the war that has divided the nation.
4 0
3 years ago
Read the argument excerpt related to teen use of smartphones and answer the question that follows: People on either side of the
lord [1]

Answer:

It fails to support its claim with specific, credible evidence and uses a disrespectful tone.

Explanation:

When giving arguments in favor or against a specific subject, they must be supported by reason and logic as well as credible evidence that can be compared with reality. They also need to be coherent with the things you are stating, this has to be done in a respectful tone as you are open to the idea of others comments and counterarguments. You are supposed to show you are right with these arguments, not by insulting or despising others.

In my opinion, this excerpt fails in both. It is not respectful and it's arguments are not strong enough.

He states that there is not proof of who is right or wrong on the debate adressed, he needs to support this with evidence. Who states that?

He the concludes that "no valid judgment can be made for everyone on whether smartphones should be banned from teens." This seems as an opinion based on his own reasoning.

After this, he starts making judgments about the people supporting the restriction, calling them naïve. This is not polite or useful. As I said, this is not based on evidence, he is contradicting himself as he stated in the first lines that there was no evidence of who was rigth or wrong.

The next lines express just his opinions based on his values and thoughts, evidence to support them is never presented.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of these completes the compound sentence? The construction workers_________________________________. a. filed a lawsuit ag
    5·1 answer
  • which one will i open first if i need to have breakfast with my friend milk,coffee,jam,mozzarella and chocolate
    13·2 answers
  • Which of the following changes did Shakespeare NOT make when he adapted the text for his play?
    15·1 answer
  • Please help ASAP!! Its due in 20 minutes
    8·2 answers
  • Read the excerpt from Thoughts and Sentiments. I saw him take a gun, a piece of cloth, and some lead for me, and then he told me
    8·2 answers
  • Please help don't copy and paste from other sites and no uneeded answers!! I have alot of work to do and this is due soon it's a
    7·1 answer
  • 9. What does Rupert Morrison tell Annette Brougham about in 'The Man Upstairs'?​
    9·1 answer
  • HELPPPP PLSSSS HELPPP
    11·1 answer
  • How do people create change mlk i had a dream speech
    8·1 answer
  • Which sentence is correct?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!