1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
uranmaximum [27]
3 years ago
15

Which statement best explains the two possible interpretations of the sonnet? The three quatrains satirize common poetic compari

sons of one’s beloved to beautiful things, suggesting that the speaker’s feelings are not strong. However, the sudden reversal in tone in the final couplet surprises and moves through its sincerity and depth of feeling, suggesting strong emotions. The speaker ridicules his mistress through his negative comparisons of her to idealized objects in the first 12 lines, which implies that he has lost interest in her. In the final couplet, though, he humorously reverses his tone and exaggerates her charms, from which readers can infer that he is being playful rather than hurtful. Some readers believe that the speaker uses satire to ridicule his mistress. Others find that his tone remains affectionate even while he speaks of her hair being "black wires," her breath reeking, or her feet mundanely treading the ground. The humorous tone in the first two quatrains show that the speaker does not take love seriously. However, in the third quatrain, he speaks of loving his mistress’s voice and that she moves as he imagines a goddess would; this shows that he is serious about love after all.
English
2 answers:
adelina 88 [10]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

I believe the best answer to be the first option:

The three quatrains satirize common poetic comparisons of one’s beloved to beautiful things, suggesting that the speaker’s feelings are not strong. However, the sudden reversal in tone in the final couplet surprises and moves through its sincerity and depth of feeling, suggesting strong emotions.

Explanation:

In his Sonnet 130, Shakespeare uses metaphor to compare his loved one to beautiful natural things. However, he does so only to conclude that the woman he loves is not better than any of those things. Her hair is like black wires, her color is an unbecoming dun, her breath smells bad, her cheeks do not have any color. Still, he loves her. He does not idolize her in any way. He sees her as the human being she is, and his love is not less valuable because of that.

Shakespeare's intention is to mock the poetry that was so in vogue back at his time. In Elizabethan England, poets often used the Petrarch form when writing about love. They would compare their lovely ladies to goddesses and natural beauties, always claiming their women were far more beautiful than any of those things. It's as if their love made them blind to their flaws. Shakespeare skillfully satirizes such custom.

Juliette [100K]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

A

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Use context clues to determine the meaning of the word elixir. Then write your best definition of the word here, along with whic
mariarad [96]

Answer:

A medicinal concoction or mixture of more than one substance.

Explanation:

Hope this helps! :)

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
6. Why was it hard for Nim to interact with other kids? (R110)
Natali [406]

Answer:

However, some children regularly act in ways that make it hard for other kids to accept them. Helping children with off-putting behaviors to recognize and change these (if possible) can make it. ;)

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
During which war did colonial newspapers come out in favor of independence?
inn [45]
<span>american revolution....since colonies were distributed at that time so at that time it was released for independence</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLEASE HELP ME SHHAJSJEJ
Paraphin [41]
I believe it’s D because they’re talking about how to get prevent mosquitoes and mosquitoes bite
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
1. Why do you think the author told the story of the Holocaust in this symbolic way? Who is this story directed to?
Dimas [21]

Explanation:

allegory

Why do the Terrible Thing take away animals one at a time?When the terrible things first came for the creatures with feathers on their backs, the animals who didn’t have feathers showed the terrible things that they they had none, while the birds tried to fly away. When the terrible things caught the birds and took them away, the other creatures were thankful that the terrible things did not take them, and they didn’t really care that the birds were taken.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • This vocal artist wrote politically-charged songs.
    10·1 answer
  • A word ending that changes the meaning and part of speech of the word is considered what type of suffix?
    9·1 answer
  • At the end of the story, what does "the ground beneath as a dry bone" symbolize?
    14·1 answer
  • How does Kenny earn the nickname "Poindexter"?
    15·1 answer
  • In The Alchemist, Which character is the first to support the boy's desires ?
    12·1 answer
  • One minister, Thomas Weld,reported that her “custom was for scholars to propound questions and she (gravely sitting in the chair
    13·2 answers
  • She really wanted a turquoise hairbrush but they only had _____.
    14·2 answers
  • What is the figurative meaning of this sentence from the excerpt?
    11·1 answer
  • Susan reported to the planning committee that most of the people she had surveyed preferred to have the party on Saturday rather
    5·1 answer
  • Qi.Which best describes what Gothic means?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!