I believe their mindset it, Nobody is above them, they only rule for their life time, nobody else. their principals would be
<span><span>1. In a dictatorship there is one party and one leader
2. In a dictatorship you are not free to speak your mind
3. Most dictators (leaders of a dictatorship) adore their countries
4. Most dictators emphasise war in their country
5. In a dictatorship the country is entirely controlled by the leader (the dictator)
6. Most dictators try to convince their country that they (the people) are supreme to all other countries</span>
( I got this from </span>http://dictatorship6i.weebly.com/principles.html )
I believe the answer is: c. receive a great deal of publicity
Overturning hearing due to technological changes usually would make a lot of people that is charge with similar cases had the basis to reduce or eliminate their sentence. Because of the magnitude of the decision, reporters usually really interested in such cases.
Answer:
Consistency
Explanation:
This is defined as a degree of harmony one maintains as he produces same result or carry out same action over a long period of time without wavering.
A consistent person decides to stay on a course of action and stays on it for a long time.
Inconsistency is when one fails to maintan such harmony in staying on a result or course of action for long.
Misha having struggles with het computer at home, if she replicates same action with the computers in school it will be said to be a consistent behaviour.
Another of such example is when one decided to work out by 7pm every night.
Answer:
c.
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that the best representation of this would be to accept initial offers of favors in good faith, but be ready to react to them as tricks, not favors, if they are later revealed as exploitation devices. This will make you seem grateful but at the same time remain defensive in case they try to exploit the reciprocity rule and want something in return.
Answer:
Conflict
Explanation:
In general terms, we can see that sociological perspectives focus on two opposing themes: While the structural or functionalist approach views society as composed of varios parts, having each a function that when fullfilled , it makes a contribution to the society's equilibrium.
The kurds have a long history as ethnic group , being in middle east. Bein identified themsevles apart from Arabic majorities and having a more progressive , secular, and western orientation, they fail still to be recognized as a state nation.
This is why Conflict theorists would argue in the case of Kurds:
Why the society has failed or why kurds have not been assimilated and giving a function and meaning?
Then they would see society as divided into groups each with different power and resources that are in a dynamic of constant struggle and exploit with one another (Turkey vs Kurds)
