Answer:
Informal reasoning
Explanation:
Informal reasoning refers to a form of reasoning that rely on general knowledge, personal thinking, and knowledge from other people in order to create a conclusion.
This type of reasoning is called 'informal' because it's not backed by proper/structured scientific research and can be heavily influenced by bias.
This can be seen in the example above. Making conclusion based on online reviews is heavily biased toward the personal preference of the reviewers.
In the National Electrical code ®, article 310 contains tables that are used to determine the proper size of a conductor.
Article 310 is to be used for general requirements for wiring, but not in areas where it's a part of an integral device like a motor, motor controller, or where covered in another a part of the NEC.
National Electrical Code, Article 310 covers general requirements for conductors rated up to and including 2000 volts and their type designations, insulations, markings, mechanical strengths, ampacity ratings, and uses.
It doesn't apply to conductors that are a part of flexible cords or fixture wires - nor does it apply to conductors that are integral parts of apparatus/equipment.
To know more about National Electrical Code here
brainly.com/question/17215290
#SPJ4
I believe the answer is: survey
When doing a survey, We collect information from group of subjects by making them answer a set of questionnaire,.
This type of data collection method usually really subjective but it could provide a more accurate/in depth data from the subjects/
Answer:
434 million
Explanation:
200 million +120 million + 114 million
Answer:
<u>The policies illustrated in excerpt above were most clearly contrary to Laisse-faire capitalism.</u>
Explanation:
“Laisse-Faire capitalism” advocates for business practices free from any government intervention or moderation (like privileges, tariffs, regulation, and subsidies), and holds that business should be driven only by the market forces. Roosevelt's policies, which sought to stabilize the US economy and protect the people, were contrary to this doctrine because they increased governmental intervention into the banking industry by supervising and regulating its practices.
