Answer:
b. Jennifer will recall the capitals and their states better than Jeff.
Explanation:
Jennifer and Jeff are studying for their geography exam. Jeff is learning the states' capitals by repeating them over and over. Jennifer is incorporating information she already knows about each state into the name of the capital. While Jeff is repeating "Sacramento is the capital of California, Sacramento is the capital of California," Jennifer is saying "SacraTOMATO is the capital of California" because she knows Sacramento is in the middle of a rich agricultural valley. If the levels-of-processing theory is correct,
Jennifer will recall the capitals and their states better than Jeff.
Jennifer is making use of word and image association in her study based on information she had already acquired, this will enable her to remember what she learnt better than Jeff who is making used of repetition which can only be store in the short term memory and likewise, a confusion in the words can unsettled what he had memorizes
Based on my general interpretation of <em>Jane Eyre</em>, Mr. Brocklehurst thinks that it is morally just to treat Jane badly because of what her aunt had falsely claimed about her (that she is a delinquent). Unlike Helen, a character portrayed in the novel as a kindhearted & forgiving Christian, Brocklehurst is a strict Christian who believes that the students who behave deserve to be treated well, whereas the troublemakers deserve bad treatment.
The fault that Brocklehurst possesses is the inability to sense the extent to which a faulty person can be punished. His (wrong) religious views cause him to be overly hypocritical of others' mistakes and, because of that, he is easily tempted to humiliate them for their mistakes. In other words, even though he attempts to spread morality around the school, he is actually doing the opposite.
Hope this helps! :)
Answer:
b. Social consensus is agreement on whether behavior is bad or good, whereas magnitude of consequences is the total harm or benefit derived from an ethical decision.
Explanation:
Social consensus can be defined as a principle or theory which is used to distinguish between what is deemed good or bad in the behavior of the people living in a society.
On the other hand, the magnitude of consequences refers to the overall harm or benefit that is associated with an ethical decision chosen by an individual or group of people.
The difference between social consensus and magnitude of consequences is that social consensus is agreement on whether behavior is bad or good, whereas magnitude of consequences is the total harm or benefit derived from an ethical decision.