All categories

2 years ago

Whose power increased after the fall of the Roman Empire? Islam Jews Catholic Church pagans

2 answers:

6 0

The power that increased after the fall of the Roman Empire is from the barbarians. They have always wanted to conquer Rome so when the fall of Roman Empire came, then they took this opportunity and led all the citizens in this place with their great power.

QveST [7]2 years ago

4 0

The barbarians because they have been wanting to invade Rome and when it fell, the invading barbarians had established their own power in most of the area of the Western Empire.

You might be interested in

Reading Washington’s words, how would you describe Washington’s attitude toward the American south and its people

mixer [17]

The correct answer:

according to Washington's words in the atlanta compromise, an attitude that promotes equality among all American citizens, whites and blacks, is clearly shown. With a degree of caution, he advocated a slow approach toward the rights of black Americans because of the impact it could have on the white population.

He had a more peaceful vision for successfully achieving the social change he wanted to implement throughout society. He encourages blacks to improve through service and work. According to these words, his attitude was considered impartial and powerless. For many, he was considered impartial in his ideas and accommodated to the interests of white Americans.

5 0

2 years ago

Which was an immediate result of the European Age of Exploration?

Wittaler [7]

Answer: [B]: "European influence spread to the Western hemisphere" .
______________________________________________________________

6 0

2 years ago

PLEASE HELP! QUESTION: How did rich and poor Americans contribute to the creation of a new economy at the end of the 19th centur

Mariana [72]

Answer:

In the explantion

Explanation:

Most residents of American cities during the Gilded Age worked demanding jobs for low wages, toiling in factories or sweatshops and returning at night to crowded and unsanitary housing. But the new era of industry and innovation didn’t only produce misery: as factories and commercial enterprises expanded, they required an army of bookkeepers, managers, and secretaries to keep business running smoothly. These new clerical jobs, which were open to women as well as men, fostered the growth of a middle class of educated office workers who spent their surplus income on a growing variety of consumer goods and leisure activities.

6 0

2 years ago

What two factors led to a larger workforce available to new industries?

Strike441 [17]

Answer:Several factors led to the rise of U.S. industrialization in the late 1800’s. New technologies like steam engines, railroads, and telegraphs made communication and transportation easier. The ability to source and transport materials across the country with ease turned many local businesses into national companies. Workplace innovations, such as the assembly-line method of production, allowed these companies to produce goods on a mass scale.

Expert Answers info

Queen Langosh eNotes educator | Certified Educator

First, we should be clear about the nature of the industrial boom that occurred in the wake of the Civil War. It was the rise of heavy industry and the production of capital goods that characterized the early phases of industrial growth during this period, and by far the biggest factor contributing to growth was the expansion of the railroads.

Railroads expanded exponentially after the Civil War, and their rapid spread facilitated and spurred industrial growth in several ways. They led to a demand for coal, timber, and especially steel, the most important commodity in this new industrial age. They connected markets, enabling businesses like the meatpacking industry to rapidly increase distribution and production. Moreover, their corporate structures formed a paradigm and a model for other industries.

In addition to this new industry, which spawned many others, industrialization was fueled by the massive influx of immigrants from Europe and elsewhere that provided a large industrial labor force. Another factor was the rapid proliferation of new technologies, a cause and an effect of industrial development. Electric light, assembly lines, the Bessemer steel process, and the telephone were just a few of the myriad innovations that helped spur industrial growth.

A final, often-overlooked factor contributing to industrialization was the role played by the federal government. In the wake of the Civil War, the government spurred the growth of railroads by setting aside massive grants of land, providing subsidies, and other measures. The government also established high tariffs and created a generally pro-business economic climate that facilitated industrial growth.

Explanation:

7 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Do you think having only two parties in power in the US is good or bad for our country? Why?

Mandarinka [93]

Answer:

The goal of voting is to elect representatives by the voice of the people. However when only two parties are allowed to run, American choices are restricted by limited views and only given two choices. This restriction seems to be effective, but is simple not accomplishing the goal of electing the representatives the people actually want. This argument says that a 2 parties system is bad 

Here is another argument

While the constitution does not provide language that explicitly endorses a two party system, a great deal of its laws perpetuate their existence like the electoral college and plurality voting. The electoral college makes it virtually impossible for a third party candidate to win any given office by discouraging votes in individual states amongst other things. Likewise, plurality voting, which guarantees the candidate with the majority of votes wins, generally favors two opposing sides as time goes by. This is only made stronger by the fact that The majority of Americans seem to lean towards the right or left, with a small percentage staying in between. As long as these systems are in place, a two party system will naturally prevail. This argument says that the 2 parties system is good.

Explanation:

It's just how you look at really if you think its bad then your think its bad same goes for the person who says its good. It's just an opinion. But each side will have supporting facts and details.

7 0

2 years ago