Answer:
Hiram, King of Tyre.
Explanation:
After King David got back the Ark of the Tabernacle, he promised God that he would build a temple for the Ark to be kept in a much more permanent location. But due to his murderous hands and the vast amount of human blood that he had shed, God told him to let the temple be built by his son Solomon.
In the book of 1 Kings chapter 5, we see Hiram, king of Tyre, and King Solomon agreeing to provide provisions for each other according to their needs. King Solomon requires "cedars of Lebanon" and asks Hiram to allow it to be sent to him, and in return, he will provide King Hiram with provisions for the royal household. <u>Verses 10 and 11</u> say, <em>"In this way Hiram kept Solomon supplied with all the cedar and juniper logs he wanted, and Solomon gave Hiram twenty thousand cors of wheat as food for his household, in addition to twenty thousand baths, of pressed olive oil. Solomon continued to do this for Hiram year after year."
</em>
Explanation:
As governance indicators have proliferated in recent years, so has their use and the controversy that surrounds them. As more and more voices are pointing out, existing indicators – many of them developed and launched in the 1990s – have a number of flaws. This is particularly disquieting at a time when governance is at the very top of the development agenda.
Many questions of crucial importance to the development community – such as issues around the relationship between governance and (inclusive) growth, or about the effectiveness of aid in different contexts – are impossible to answer with confidence as long as we do not have good enough indicators, and hence data, on governance.
The litany of problems concerning existing governance indicators has been growing:
Indicators produced by certain NGOs (e.g. the Heritage Foundation), but also by commercial risk rating agencies (such as the PRS Group), are biased towards particular types of policies, and consequently, the assessment of governance becomes mingled with the assessment of policy choices;
Many indicators rely on surveys of business people (e.g. the World Economic Forum's Executive Opinion Survey). While they have important insights into governance challenges given their interaction with government bureaucracies, the views of other stakeholders are also important and remain underrepresented, as are concerns about governance of less relevance to the business community (e.g. civil and human rights);
The other main methodology used are indicators produced by individuals or small groups of external experts – for example, the World Bank’s Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA), Bertelsmann’s Transformation Index, and the French Development Agency’s Institutional Profiles. This entails the risk that different experts ‘feed’ on each other’s ratings; and the depth to which external raters are able to explore the dimensions they are rating can vary.
Answer: The value of shares rose sharply as the company grew. Early investors made a great deal of money from their shares.
Investors from across Europe purchased shares in the company.
The value of shares in the company doubled in a short period of time.
Explanation:
Important events and birth. Or a historical event
Answer:
A. Democracy wealth and culture flourished in Athens
