D)
By a direct vote of the people.
Answer:
No, I don’t think the Brown court would have said that people could be separated by race on a train. Brown fought against segregation in schools because it was unconstitutional and violated the 14th Amendment. I can’t see why they would agree with segregation in other institutions.
The Plessy case, which occurred quite a bit earlier than the Brown case, ruled that segregation was okay as long as it was “separate but equal.” If it was Plessy v. Brown, Brown could have made the argument that “If it has to be separate, it’s not truly equal.” There’s no reason to divide the people unless there’s unfair treatment involved.
Answer:
true
Explanation:
yup it's TRUE
hope this will help uuuuu
The possibility of gaining natural resources that the colonies mined and uncovered was imminent
The parts of criminal trials that has not been part of selective incorporation
is the the right to a jury composed from the area where the crime was
committed .
The criminal trials have experienced some amendments over the years such as the right to a speedy and public trial.
The right to a jury composed from the area where the crime was committed
hasn't however been fully incorporated as the main aim of a trial is to secure
an accurate conviction.
Read more on brainly.com/question/25260121
