1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
exis [7]
3 years ago
14

"A Modest Proposal" What problem does the speaker describe in the opening paragraph of "A Modest Proposal"? a. Too many Irish pe

ople are immigrating to other countries. b. Many Irish people are too poor to feed their children. c. The Irish government has caused poverty by over-taxing the people. d. Traveling throughout Ireland is difficult.
English
1 answer:
Norma-Jean [14]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

B). Many Irish people are too poor to feed their children.

Explanation:

'A Modest Proposal' is one of the most admired and acknowledged satires of Swift which primarily intends to portray the reality of extreme prevailing poverty in Ireland and critique England's constant legal as well as economic exploitation of Irish people by using parody and exaggeration along with irony and absurdity.

As per the question, the key issue that Swift highlights in the very opening paragraph of the essay is 'several Irish people suffering even to feed their children.' He exposes the <u>chronic poverty that Irish people were undergoing which was a consequence of the relentless pursuit of power and wealth by English hypocrites</u>. He satirizes how these wealthy monsters have utterly exploited these poor people(and their resources) that they are not even left with food to feed their little children. Therefore, <u>option B</u> is the correct answer.

You might be interested in
What is the definition of Onerous
KATRIN_1 [288]

Answer:

adjective

(of a task, duty, or responsibility) involving an amount of effort and difficulty that is oppressively burdensome.

"he found his duties increasingly onerous

Explanation:

google

7 0
3 years ago
Explain the transaction between Mr. Frederick and Napoleon. Why does Napoleon blame Snowball?
maw [93]

Answer:

<u>Explain the transaction between Mr. Frederick and Napoleon.</u>

There is another incident in Chapter Seven in which Napoleon finds a pile of timber and instructs Mr. Whymper to sell it. Pilkington and Frederick are both "anxious" to buy the wood, and Napoleon spends some time deciding to whom he should sell. In the next chapter, Napoleon decides to sell the timber to Frederick, but Frederick pays for the logs with forged banknotes. When Napoleon realizes what has happened, he is furious and pronounces the sentence of death upon Frederick. Frederick and his men then attack the farm and blow up the windmill.

<u>Why does Napoleon blame Snowball?</u>

Snowball is blamed for the ruination of community project, and Napoleon gets exactly what he wanted, control over the other animals. Complete control. Afterwards, Napoleon supports the rebuilding of the windmill, something he wanted all along but now he has initiated the project; it becomes his.

Napoleon uses the scape-goat, a style of propaganda which points blame elsewhere. Some of the problems on Animal Farm were within Napoleon's power to solve, others were not. No matter what the problem was Napoleon pointed to Snowball so the animals would point their need for justice there. Had there been opportunity for them to place their anger, they would have lashed out on Snowball.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How is the heading important to the readers understanding of the diary entry
TiliK225 [7]

Answer: Its like the main idea in a book you read. The first sentence in the box tells the whole story so the heading of the entry tells the whole story of   how the writer felt when they poured out their thoughts.

Explanation:

Hope this helps you

8 0
3 years ago
Which words should you change in this sentence to create an optimistic tone? The ominous sky foreshadows a dark day in this team
ElenaW [278]
Ominous, Dark, Choke and sack
8 0
3 years ago
Need to write a letter about holiday abroad is bad for environment <br><br> PLEASE ANSWER PROBABLY
Serjik [45]

Answer:

I believe in travel. Heck, I have an entire website and career dedicated to making people do it more!

But, in the rush to get people to travel, we often overlook the negative impact of travel on communities and the environment. We talk about how travel can be a force for good: breaking down social barriers, connecting people, teaching people about life, and themselves but….

Is too much travel a bad thing?

Is there an argument to be made for traveling less?

Are we all, even with the best intentions, doing harm to the very thing we want the most?

Nothing is ever perfect but if I had to make an argument against travel, these are the points I would make:

Travel destroys local cultures – The globalization of food, travel, hotels, and language diminishes the very culture we traveled so far to see. Instead of going out to seek the unknown, most people stay in resorts and hotels, never experiencing the country they are in. We go to McDonald’s or eat food we can get at home. It’s as though we travel to never leave home. Wherever we go, we seem to bring our western culture with us.

Travel makes the world Disneyland – From the hill tribes of Thailand to the Andes to cowboys of America, travelers have a certain expectation of what a place is and how the people should act. We travel to see that expectation. We travel to see Crocodile Dundee, Mayans, Native Americans, and hill tribe cultures in Asia. Cultures around the world then put on a show to give us what we want and in the process “Disneyize” their culture. I hate seeing the little hill tribes in Thailand or Native American shows in America or “traditional” dance in Vietnam. It’s not how they really act. It’s how they act for tourists. Doesn’t that just cheapen the experience and, in the end, cause more harm than good?

Travel destroys local economies – All that travel in big hotels and global restaurants doesn’t help the local economy. Most of that money is removed by corporations to the head office. Travelers go with what they know and most will stay at the Marriott before they stay in some unknown place, never thinking about where the money is going. Travel can be a huge economic boon but only if the money stays local.

Travel hurts the environment – Traveling is not the most eco-friendly of activities. Flying, cruising, eating out, and driving around all have a negative impact on the environment. Most people when they travel constantly use towels in hotel rooms, leave the air conditioner going, or forget to turn off the lights. Jetsetting around the world in airplanes or driving around in an RV all contribute to global warming. Between waste, development, and pollution, we are doing exactly what The Beach said we would do — destroy the very paradise we seek.

Travel produces short-term profits – Everyone tries to grab that last dollar. Travel isn’t the only industry this happens with but it’s the most relevant to us. Instead of building for the long term, people overdevelop in the name of short-term gain. You see it in Thailand with its built up beaches, in Cambodia, in southern Spain, and in Las Vegas with all the casinos (where’s all that water going to come from?). It’s everywhere. Money now, forget later. Eventually, the tourists will stop coming because they will be so put off and so sad the beauty they came for is gone.

***

While there is a growing effort among people to mitigate these downsides, the truth is we can’t ignore overtourism and the negative side of travel. Yet I don’t think these reasons should make us stop traveling. In fact, I’m just thinking out loud here. Simply letting the wheels turn.

At the end of the day, these negatives come down to personal choice. You can easily travel the world and not do any of these things. I don’t fly much, I don’t stay in giant hotels, I avoid chain restaurants, I stay in local guesthouses, and I won’t do tours that exploit animals or the environment.

Things are only good or bad if they make them to be. If you stay with travelers, never get out of the tourist area, never look up from your phone, waste water, and ride elephants, yeah you’re travel is bad for the world.

But if you do the opposite, then there’s no reason why your travel can’t be a force for good.

While many travelers are good at thinking about the environment and cultures, the majority aren’t. And so I do think there is a strong argument to be made that travel does cause a lot of problems that should make us rethink how and why we travel. There’s a downside to what we do and we should take it upon ourselves not to do those things so we can keep travel the benefit that it is.

Let’s be a force for good and change the way we travel by using our money to support better local environmental initiatives and companies.

8 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • can I write about how can someone stop being a caffein addict a​ caffein addiction informative writing, or should I​ write about
    8·1 answer
  • Why do speakers emphasize particular words and phrases?
    10·1 answer
  • WILL give brainlest if answered less then 5 mins
    7·2 answers
  • Why was the statue called "Liberty Enlightening the World"?
    12·1 answer
  • Why did the Winchester’s company become so successful in the late 1800’s? What was happening in America at that time,
    12·1 answer
  • Read the introduction from a geology book. Metamorphic rocks are rocks which have changed from one type to another. For example,
    14·2 answers
  • Which statement its true about a oral tradition
    8·2 answers
  • Read the excerpt from "At School."
    15·2 answers
  • Choose the correct answer. Animal tales are stories about
    5·2 answers
  • What's the best ANTONYM (the word or phrase most nearly the same)
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!