The most effective and efficient way to move forward with an idea is "create a prototype".
A prototype is an early example, model, or arrival of an item worked to test an idea or process or to go about as a thing to be reproduced or learned from. It is a term utilized in an assortment of settings, including semantics, plan, hardware, and programming.
Answer:
Exploratory
Explanation:
Sheena, marketing manager for Yaard-Vark Lawn Tractors, is interested in the relationship between the prices of lawn tractors and the level of sales. To test whether increasing prices will lead to a change in sales and, if so, how much of a change, she should use exploratory research.
Exploratory research is the kind of research where an unknown phenomenon is worked upon. In this case, Sheena does not know the effects of prices on sales. Therefore she carries out exploratory research to fill in the blanks.
Answer:
The answer is (B) transfer dollars, and therefore purchasing power, into the future.
Explanation:
A store of value is best described as a function contained in an asset that allows it to be saved, retrieved, and traded in the future. Money provides this function, alongside other forms of assets such as bonds, gemstones, and precious metals. Other functions of money, include as a medium of exchange and a unit of account.
Answer:
Explanation:
1.
Direct labour hours work during the period:
Product S=72,400 units×1 hour=72,400 hours
Product W=18,100 units × 3 hours=54,300 hours
Total labour hours=126,700 hour
Predetermined overhead rate=$958,396/126,700 =7.56 per hour
2.
Unit product cost of S = Direct Material cost + Direct labour cost + Overhead = 12+16+7.56*1 = $35.56
Unit product cost of W = Direct Material cost + Direct labour cost + Overhead = 34+13+7.56*3 = $69.68
Answer: C. The court concluded that Microsoft violated the Sherman Act
Explanation: The case between United States v. Microsoft Corporation which took place at the
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit during the period February 26–27, 2001 and was finally decided June 28, 2001.
It was decided by the District Court that Microsoft violated the Sharma Antitrust Act of 1890.
