Answer:
In any regard, supporters of <em>laissez-faire </em>governmental policies were often advocates for the "free market". They would suggest that federal or state involvement in business would stagnate and decelerate the growth of the economy. The "invisible hand" of the market does not actually exist, but this argument would be made in order to support the assertion that government involvement was not required. In reality, significant economic downfalls of the past could have been avoided, had the governments of "unregulated business" nations played a more active role. Claims such as these were made for the purpose of promoting a self-sustaining economy, even when such a thing cannot coexist with financial disparity.
I hope this helped you understand the motives behind <em>laissez-faire </em> business and government policies. Blessings to you.
Answer:
I have a feeling its D. I tried to search it but it seems that it wouldnt tell me. Im sorry if this was wrong. im was really trying to help.
California outlawed slavery. Southern states didn't want California to be admitted to the union as a free state because it would upset the balance of free states to slave states. This was compromised Later in 1850
There is no image, please give me an image and I'll gladly help you.
May I have brainliest please? :)
Jamestown and Plymouth were two of the colonies that English immigrants settled into when they left England mostly because of Religious freedom.
