Answer:
I don't know what your talking about
<span>It is not in exercise of a fundamental freedom</span>
The correct answer is, Trying to cover too much material. According to the textbook, a common mistake students make when developing their first speech is Trying to cover too much material.
Explanation:
Students who go to deliver their first speech are not experienced in giving speeches to audience. They don't know what and how much to put in to make a catchy speech. The rule for delivering speech is to make it small and concise. This is because the audience don't get bored and their attention must be maintained throughout the speech.
Students who prepare their first speech, make mistake of putting too much material in their speech. They think that putting too much material will make their speech sound informative, whereas they should put just the important related material and should make it concise. By making a speech short and concise, the audience don't lose interest and listen to the speaker with attention.
Learn more about speech at:
brainly.com/question/1256629
#LearnWithBrainly
This type of dualism describes that <u>each mind is a distinct nonphysical res</u>, an individual cluster of nonphysical substance, a thing whose properties are independent of a body that may be "connected". According to her, mental states come from these same non-physical, distinct and unique properties of substance.
A division of reality into two basic types of substance: the first was the ordinary type that had the characteristic of occupying a place in space, having length, width and height. Although the connotation of the material substance seemed to have no importance, it was largely exacerbated by Descartes, where his writings would serve as the basis for Newton's mechanical extrapolations.
However, there was a substance that was beyond its reach of explanation by mechanics. This substance was human conscious reason. This meant that Descartes proposed a different type of substance. A substance without extension or place in space, where its essential characteristic was the human activity of thinking.
The most acceptable point of the theory is that the mind and body performed different functions, and the most acceptable criticism is that the two worked together.
I believe it is a good theory, but the truth is that it is an erroneous theory, but for the time it was a revolution and it was from there that one began to understand the concept of what would be the "mind". The solution is that the theory is wrong, but it has led to great achievements today.
