Answer:
the adjusted cash balance as on April 30,2018 is $77,800
Explanation:
The computation of the adjusted cash balance as on April 30,2018 is as follows;
= Balance as per bank statement + deposit in transit - outstanding checks
= $78,800 + $9,300 - $10,300
= $77,800
Hence, the adjusted cash balance as on April 30,2018 is $77,800
We simply applied the above formula so that the accurate value could arrive
Answer:
$4,000
Explanation:
The computation of the cash to be required to settle the liability is shown below:
= Purchase value of inventory - returned inventory which was purchased
= $5,000 - $1,000
= $4,000
It is a net purchase plus it is the cash required to settle the liability
There is no discount applied in the question as dates are not given so we ignored it.
Answer:
SCC won't pay any tax
Explanation:
Their loss of $30,000 in year 1 will be unused and made available to counterbalance the total generated earnings in year 2.
The $20,000 earnings in year 2 can be used to counterbalance the whole taxable income; so, SCC will not pay pay tax. SCC will have a ($10,000) loss carryover available for year 3 and beyond
Answer:
$112,500
Explanation:
July August September October
Credit Sales(90000*75%) 67,500
(110,000*75%) 82,500
(120,000*75%) 90,000
Cash Sales (120,000*25% 30,000
<em>Total Cash expected to be collected in September will be;</em>
Credit Sales of August $82,500
Cash Sales of September $30,000
Total cash expected to be collected in September =$112,500
Answer:
D : All options are correct
Explanation:
- The marginal buyer is the essence of demand curve while marginal seller is essence of supply curve.
- @ Q = 500 units, Selling Price is set at SP = $35
- @ Q = 500 units, Buying Price is set at BP = $40
- Since, SP ≠ BP our equilibrium price would be $ 37.5 assuming the price elasticity of demand and supply are equal. In any case the equilibrium price would lie in between [ 35 , 40 ] such that to prevent a shortage of units in near future.
- Moreover, if the seller decides to sell at price $35 then he must sell goods greater than 500 units to reach the equilibrium profits. However, it could also lead to excess of units or surplus.
- We see that from selling the goods at SP = $35 while the buyer is willing to pay BP = $40 for 500 goods, the seller would be under-profiting and would be earning $5*500 = $2,500 less than he would at equilibrium price of $40 and selling units greater than 500. Hence, 500 goods is not an efficient quantity of goods.