Answer:
B. Flattened management hierarchies.
Explanation:
In this scenario, the line workers at a Virginia steel mill developed a new process that made the line safer. The process went through only one level of management before it was approved by the vice president of operations. Hence, this is an example of a flattened management hierarchies.
A flattened management hierarchy can be defined as an organizational structure which eliminates a middle manager and allows the employees to be involved directly with the decision-making process.
Hence, by the removal of the middle management in an organization, the flattened management hierarchy creates a direct relationship between employees and the top executives of the company; thus, giving room for innovation and actions by employees in the decision-making process.
Answer:
$330
Explanation:
The computation of the dividend income received as on July 31 is shown below:
where,
Total number of shares purchased is
= 100 shares + 200 shares
= 300 shares
And, the dividend per share is $1.10
So, the dividend income received is
= 300 shares × $1.10
= $330
We simply applied the above formula to determine the dividend income received
Answer:
To know what things they should buy and how much they should pay
Explanation:
Answer:
<u>Zone of tolerance</u>
Explanation:
Zone of tolerance with respect to a service refers to, the acceptable range to a customer, that lies between the perceived desired level of service expected and the minimum level of service acceptable.
The service which the customer anticipates or expects to be delivered by a firm is referred to as predicted service.
Customer expectations do not depict a single level of expectation, rather they follows a range of expectations. This range is represented as zone of tolerance.
If the service received lies in the zone of tolerance, the customer would be satisfied. If it is higher than the desired level, the customer would consider it exceptional.
In case the service received falls below the minimum level of acceptance, the customer would be disappointed and feel deceived or tricked.
Answer:
Grace is incorrect because of the veil and alter ego theory
Explanation:
In this scenario Grace formed a corporation along with her three friends. As a result of catering services offered guest became ill and sued Grace and the other owners for damages.
According to the alter egos theory personal liability can be invoked on the owners of a corporation or its limited liability members.
Alter ego theory is used to penetrate the corporate veil that protects shareholders. Personal liability can be assigned on the business owner as it is in this case against Grace and the other owners.
