A leader is someone that possess leadership skills.
<h3>Who is a leader?</h3>
A leader can be defined as someone that possess leadership skills and has the capacity or ability to lead people.
A leader tend to live an exemplary life that is worthy of emulation and must be capable to direct people under him or her.
Therefore A leader is someone that possess leadership skills.
Learn more about who is a leader here:brainly.com/question/12522775
#SPJ1
Answer:
Los hunos, un pueblo procedente de las estepas del Asia Central, posiblemente de origen prototúrquico, aunque existen versiones de que se trataba de un pueblo iranio, invaden territorios de la Europa Oriental y parte de la Europa Central, desplazando a pueblos germánicos tales como los godos o los francos hacia el decadente Imperio Romano de Occidente, al cual le haría frecuentes saqueos y campañas violentas durante la primera mitad del siglo V.
Explanation:
Los hunos, un pueblo procedente de las estepas del Asia Central, posiblemente de origen prototúrquico, aunque existen versiones de que se trataba de un pueblo iranio, invaden territorios de la Europa Oriental y parte de la Europa Central, desplazando a pueblos germánicos tales como los godos o los francos hacia el decadente Imperio Romano de Occidente, al cual le haría frecuentes saqueos y campañas violentas durante la primera mitad del siglo V.
Answer:
<em>The Federal Housing Finance Agency, regulator of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, announced that the two mortgage giants will now buy home loans that go into the government's forbearance program just after they close. Fannie and Freddie had not been doing that, and as a result, lending had tightened up dramatically. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac created a liquid secondary market for mortgages. This meant that financial institutions no longer had to hold onto the mortgages they originated. They could sell mortgages on the secondary market shortly after origination. Selling mortgages freed up funds for creating additional mortgages.</em>
Explanation:
Answer:
It was not
Explanation:
The civil war still proceeded to happen over the morality and legality of slavery, so the Missouri compromise was clearly ineffective at preventing war and appeasing both sides permanently.
