Answer: One step at a time. You are supposed to compare the two helpers from the stories you read. How are they similar? Then,
You are supposed to contrast them. How are they different from each other?
Explanation:
If you have speech to text, use it to just get the answers to those questions on your screen.
Then go back and remove the "I think" and "In my opinion" etc.
Go through the rubric to see what your teacher expects.
Write in organized paragraphs.
Post your ideas in another question here, and ask for comments and corrections.
Get started!
The mortercycal if roaring like a loin
Answer:
They didn't reach an agreement <u><em>on account of</em></u> their differences.
Explanation:
In the given sentence, the necessary word(s) to be put in the blank will be suggestive of the 'cause' of the first part of the sentence. While the first part contains the effect' of the 'cause', completing the whole sentence depends on the part or parts of the phrase needed.
The given options "on account of", "due", "because" or "owing" are all valid to be used in the given sentence. But considering the form and structure of the sentence, the blank will be filled by "on account of".
To use the other options, we would need to add more to the already given words. We cannot simply write "they didn't reach an agreement due/owing/because their differences." For "due" and "owing", it needs "to" to make the sentence whole. Likewise, "because" requires "of" to be usable. If we add these words to the already given words, then the sentence can become
they didn't reach an agreement due to/ because of/ owing to their differences. But these options are wrong as the words are incomplete.
Thus, the correct answer is "on account of".
<em><u>They didn't reach an agreement on account of their differences.</u></em>
Answer:
b. it is weak because it does not provide details about Harriet Tubman's life.
Explanation:
I think that's pretty self explanatory.
Answer:
O Despite the controversy surrounding its origins, the impact of film is not contested
Explanation:
In the given passage, Yuma wrote the impact of film in the modern world. The given conclusion also includes a statement about how it would become a normal presence in our lives.
But among the given options, the sentence <em>"despite the controversy surrounding its origins the impact of film is not contested"</em> would be the best addition to the given conclusion passage. This is because the two conclusion sentences were written by Yuma mention the time film emerged and be a part of daily American life. And adding detail about the controversy surrounding the origin of films and how their impact is not contested will add to a much more detailed conclusion.
Thus, the correct answer is the third option.
