Which Social Groups were initially left out of the U.S. Constitution?

History

1 answer:

bija089 [108]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

Rights, But Not for Everyone

Women were second-class citizens, essentially the property of their husbands, unable even to vote until 1920, when the 19th Amendment was passed and ratified. Native Americans were entirely outside the constitutional system, defined as an alien people in their own land.

Explanation:

You might be interested in

The Neolithic Revolution

uysha [10]

Answer:

The neolithic revolution

Explanation:

This was a new start to all groups. It evolved hunter and gatherers into a more "civilized" population. The people found out about agriculture. People started to farm more which lead to a good source of sustainable food. This lead people to settle down and build in the area they farmed in. More food created a more stable life which helped increase the population.

6 0

3 years ago

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain una

slavikrds [6]

Pretty sure your answer would be C

7 0

3 years ago

Which of the following would be an example of a grievance by the Colonists?

Sedbober [7]

Answer:

Explanation:

3 0

4 years ago

PLSSSS HELPPPPP<br><br> In what way did Christianity unite the inhabitants of medieval Europe

arsen [322]

<h2>Medieval Europe: The spread of Christianity</h2>

<h3>Christianity in the middle ages dominated the lives of both peasants and the nobility. Religious institutors including the Church and the monasteries became wealthy and influential given the fact that the state allocated a significant budget for religious activities.</h3>

<h2><u>please</u><u> </u><u>mark</u><u> </u><u>in</u><u> </u><u>brain</u><u> </u><u>list</u><u> </u></h2>

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The question in every case is whether the words used are used in such circumstances and are of such a nature as to create a clea

Assoli18 [71]

The argument made by Holmes was that the protection of free speech is important but there are some cases in which personal expression is irresponsible and can be banned.

<h3>What is the case of Schenck v. United States?</h3>

The Court determined that a state could constitutionally limit an individual's free speech rights under the First Amendment.

Hence, the Justice of the state made an argument that the the protection of free speech is important but there are some cases in which personal expression is irresponsible and can be banned.

Therefore, the Option C is correct.

Read more about Schenck v. United States

<em>brainly.com/question/2764676</em>

#SPJ1

3 0

2 years ago