The two motivation includes the protection of consumers and dismantling of monopolies.
In order to better American society, more emphasis was placed on openness and accountability in government during the Progressive Era.
There have been numerous reforms throughout this time regarding, among other things: women's political rights, food safety regulations, civil service reform, workers' rights, and others.
Anti-trust laws were put in place as a set of guidelines to safeguard consumers from unfair business practises and promote competitiveness among producers.
Therefore, the Progressive Era's anti-trust laws were inspired by the need to safeguard consumers and break up corporate monopolies. The only method to break a legal monopoly is to put pressure on the government to alter the legislation and eliminate market limitations through a procedure known as deregulation. This may be the result of consumer demand, a shift in technology, or lobbying by businesses looking to enter a market.
Learn more about dismantling of monopolies:
brainly.com/question/27868407
#SPJ4
Because they were rich, they could sponsor a lot of painters, and could choose whether to make or break the artist
Alexandria was the only Egyptian city that had a significant Christian population as well as Carthage
Yes, if you do not have the credentials you cannot prove anything that they claim. it also does matter if they have given testimony in previous cases because it means that they have worked with cases before and would be willing to help again. also it showed that they have proper experience in it.
