Answer:
<u>A) If it weren’t for Francis Pizarro’s, the Inca Empire would have continued to expand and prosper.</u>
<u>Explanation:</u>
Consider, for example, we are told at the outset, <em>"When Spanish conquistador Francisco Pizarro landed in Peru in 1532, he found unimaginable riches. The Inca Empire was in full bloom." </em>
However, we were told that Pizarro captured and requested ransom from the last Inca emperor Atahualpa. What was the outcome? The text tells us, "Once Pizarro had executed the last emperor, the empire rapidly collapsed." This detail brings out the central idea of the text, that is, "If it weren’t for Francis Pizarro’s, the Inca Empire would have continued to expand and prosper."
The organization is world trade organization
Critics often criticize the organization on putting much emphasis on business interests of members while foregoing the sustainable development debate, which calls for present generations to use resources in a way that does not jeopardize the ability of future generations to enjoy the same resources.
The Homestead Act was attractive to settlers, because it gave land to anyone over 21, or head of family (even women and former slaves), who applied for land, this land for a very cheap price (or no price at all) and through this it enabled easy settlement. The farmers had to then cultivate the land for a period of time, and if they did not abandon it and tended to it properly, it became their property.
That could go both ways, maybe they didnt own a plantation or have use for a slave. But they still could support it. Or, they could be completely against it, and think its completely wrong and dehumanizing, they could help runaway slaves get to the north.
