1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lianna [129]
3 years ago
12

In The Death of Ivan Ilyich, Tolstoy explores the mind of a man struggling with the reality of his impending death. Ivan Ilyich

must come to terms not only with his death but also with the emptiness of his past life. How well has Ivan’s life thus far prepared him to face death? Cite evidence from the text to support your analysis.
English
2 answers:
Ilya [14]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Throughout the novella, Ivan Ilyich consistently represents the superficial middle-class Russians that Tolstoy is criticizing. Ivan Ilyich tries to distract himself from thinking about his death by immersing himself in work. Even as illness takes hold of his body, he continues to go to work until near the very end of his life. In earlier chapters, it becomes clear that Ivan Ilyich does not enjoy being with his family and works to avoid spending time with them. Further into the novella, despite the nearing reality of his death, Ivan continues to show that he values his possessions more than his family:

In these latter days he would go into the drawing-room he had arranged…. He would enter and see that something had scratched the polished table. He would look for the cause of this and find that it was the bronze ornamentation of an album that had got bent. He would take up the expensive album which he had lovingly arranged, and feel vexed with his daughter and her friends for their untidiness—for the album was torn here and there and some of the photographs turned upside down. He would put it carefully in order and bend the ornamentation back into position. Then it would occur to him to place all those things in another corner of the room, near the plants. He would call the footman, but his daughter or wife would come to help him. They would not agree, and his wife would contradict him, and he would dispute and grow angry.

Ivan Ilyich’s shallow attitude toward life does not prepare him to deal well with the prospect of dying. His impending death throws him into a state of confusion. As his thoughts swing between hope and despair, he uses his sophisticated mind to twist logic and deny the inevitability of his death:

Ivan Ilyich saw that he was dying, and he was in continual despair. In the depth of his heart he knew he was dying, but not only was he not accustomed to the thought, he simply did not and could not grasp it. The syllogism he had learnt from Kiesewetter's Logic: "Caius is a man, men are mortal, therefore Caius is mortal," had always seemed to him correct as applied to Caius, but certainly not as applied to himself…. "Caius really was mortal, and it was right for him to die; but for me, little Vanya, Ivan Ilyich, with all my thoughts and emotions, it's altogether a different matter. It cannot be that I ought to die. That would be too terrible."

Pavel [41]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:hroughout the novella, Ivan Ilyich consistently represents the superficial middle-class Russians that Tolstoy is criticizing. Ivan Ilyich tries to distract himself from thinking about his death by immersing himself in work. Even as illness takes hold of his body, he continues to go to work until near the very end of his life. In earlier chapters, it becomes clear that Ivan Ilyich does not enjoy being with his family and works to avoid spending time with them. Further into the novella, despite the nearing reality of his death, Ivan continues to show that he values his possessions more than his family:

In these latter days he would go into the drawing-room he had arranged…. He would enter and see that something had scratched the polished table. He would look for the cause of this and find that it was the bronze ornamentation of an album that had got bent. He would take up the expensive album which he had lovingly arranged, and feel vexed with his daughter and her friends for their untidiness—for the album was torn here and there and some of the photographs turned upside down. He would put it carefully in order and bend the ornamentation back into position. Then it would occur to him to place all those things in another corner of the room, near the plants. He would call the footman, but his daughter or wife would come to help him. They would not agree, and his wife would contradict him, and he would dispute and grow angry.

Ivan Ilyich’s shallow attitude toward life does not prepare him to deal well with the prospect of dying. His impending death throws him into a state of confusion. As his thoughts swing between hope and despair, he uses his sophisticated mind to twist logic and deny the inevitability of his death:

Ivan Ilyich saw that he was dying, and he was in continual despair. In the depth of his heart he knew he was dying, but not only was he not accustomed to the thought, he simply did not and could not grasp it. The syllogism he had learnt from Kiesewetter's Logic: "Caius is a man, men are mortal, therefore Caius is mortal," had always seemed to him correct as applied to Caius, but certainly not as applied to himself…. "Caius really was mortal, and it was right for him to die; but for me, little Vanya, Ivan Ilyich, with all my thoughts and emotions, it's altogether a different matter. It cannot be that I ought to die. That would be too terrible."

Explanation:

You might be interested in
The teacher answered my questions ?<br> (passive)​
Anon25 [30]

Answer:

my question was answered by the teacher

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Please help ASAP
shepuryov [24]

Answer:

c

Explanation:

  • its c because you need a illustration for a print of it doesn't have one it's just gonna be blank
8 0
3 years ago
Our topic is about gun violence but I'm not sure what to write here. Please help! Please give me a full and good answer. :(
WARRIOR [948]
Im a weeb so give me points
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which two sentences in the excerpt from Common Sense by Thomas Paine indicates that Great Britain protected the American colonie
Katarina [22]

The correct answers are:

"That she hath engrossed us is true, and defended the continent at our expense as well as her own is admitted, and she would have defended Turkey from the same motive, viz., the sake of trade and dominion."

AND

"We have boasted the protection of Great Britain, without considering, that her motive was interest not attachment"

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
So i have to have this done asap and the book is called ungifted by Gordon Korman
astra-53 [7]

Answer:

Hi ari ^w^

Explanation:

XOXO

Kit

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • “I am not going to use personal politics against my opponent, but at least with me you get someone with good family values!” Thi
    7·1 answer
  • Which characteristic of a tragic hero does macbeth have
    7·1 answer
  • Select all the correct answers.
    8·1 answer
  • Critical thinkers
    13·1 answer
  • In the prologue what tone is used in the description of the Oxford Cleric
    10·2 answers
  • 7. Lines 169-176: What simile is in these lines? What two things are compared, and
    5·1 answer
  • How are the butter churn and dasher symbolic for the narrator in “everyday use”?
    5·1 answer
  • Read the sentence.
    12·2 answers
  • Why does Bilbo give the Arkenstone to Bard and the Elvenking?
    7·1 answer
  • Read the passage.
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!