The correct answer to this open question is the following.
I am going to help you explain the similarities between Nelson Mandela and Mohandas Gandhi’s points of view of the use of violence to change a government.
Both are considered great leaders in the modern history of humanity.
They had very strong convictions about freedom and the way to get it.
Gandhi and Mandela could convince their people that a non-violent approach to protest was the best form to organize mobilizations and demonstrations.
They could make people move to action to fight against oppression and injustices.
Both leaders spend time in prison due to political reasons.
They were considered to have nationalistic ideas and loved their respective countries.
Answer:
The answer is C.
Explanation:
Alfred Thayer Mahan (1840-1914) conceived the idea that sea power was the key to a strong foreign policy. His thinking is behind the building and strengthening of the US Navy, dominating American naval planning. He was so influential that his ideas led to a race among powers to have powerful navies in the 19th and the 20th centuries.
Answer:
Christians felt that it was their duty to go and convert people to the faith so that those people could be saved and could go to heaven. If they went exploring, they could come into contact with non-Christians and could try to convert those people. Thus, we say that “God” was one reason for exploration.
Explanation:
<span>Good Morning!
</span>The PROFILE is a service provided by <span>the College Board (b)</span><span>.
</span>PROFILE is a student funding service provided by CollegeBoard, not directly linked to the United States federal government.
Hugs!
There are many theories to power, be they liberal, socialist or otherwise. Many have been developed over centuries of thought, which pick apart the very nature of our society and world order. But of all the theories that I’ve come across, one sticks out more than any other, and it is the reason I hold such strong free-market/anti-state views. It’s called Public Choice theory, but don’t ask me why, because it seems to explain why any one but ’the public’ makes choices today.
Public Choice theory is modern, having only really taken off during the 1960’s, but I believe it grants a very realistic and worrying view of Britain’s power structure, and exposes many very deep scars which socialism and Keynesianism unintentionally inflicted on our country. It was heavily developed by the US economist James Buchanan, who won the 1986 Nobel Memorial Prize for his work, and who advised Margaret Thatcher through the Institute for Economic Affairs during the late 1970′s.
Just like capitalism, Public Choice theory is based on two simple assumptions about human nature. Firstly, that humans are principally self-interested. That’s not to say we’re selfish, which is somewhat more immoral, but rather that we will always aim to fulfil our wants and desires, economic or otherwise. Secondly, that humans are rational; when presented with a series of options, we will select whichever makes us the most happy for the least cost. Rational Choice theory, as it is called, has come under substantial intellectual attack in the past, and I don’t personally believe that all humans act completely rationally all the time, but as a model for human behaviour, I’d say it provides a pretty good analysis.
