1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mafiozo [28]
3 years ago
7

At first, Sojourner Truth was happy to have many children because

History
2 answers:
Soloha48 [4]3 years ago
3 0
At first, Sojourner Truth was happy to have many children because C. they were the only things that gave her joy.

Being a slave and married to a slave, it ensures that the children borne of this union will also become slaves, that is why Sojourner Truth ran away with her infant daughter from her owner. She did not want her children to grow up as slaves, thus, she fought for the freedom of her son, Peter, when she found out that he had been sold.
She also became an abolitionist and a women's rights activist. Fighting for the right to freedom through emancipation by giving speeches and preaching for the abolition of slavery.
poizon [28]3 years ago
3 0
The answer is a. Hope it help
You might be interested in
Read the excerpt from the Atlantic Charter.
Serga [27]

The excerpt states that the United States and Great Britain agree that people have the right to make their own political decisions.

Answer: Option A

<u>Explanation: </u>

The idea of democracy has been unequivocally upheld by countries like the United States and Great Britain through centuries. The leaders of these countries have repeatedly emphasized the right of the common people to exercise choice in the form of government they want.

Numerous historical documents produced and treasured by the men of these two countries are evidence of the concept of 'consent of the governed'. The Atlantic Charter is one such document that exhibits the democratic thought of the contemporary leaders of the two countries.

The right of people to make political decisions based on their own thinking is one of the fundamental factors that strengthen democracies all over the world.

3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Concerned with a case in which a group of students wore black armbands to school in protest of the Vietnam war, Tinker v. Des Mo
larisa [96]

Answer:

On Feb. 24, 1969, the court ruled 7-2 that students do not “shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate.”

The court found that the First Amendment applied to public schools, and school officials could not censor student speech unless it disrupted the educational process. Because wearing a black armband was not disruptive, the court held that the First Amendment protected the right of students to wear them.

The court’s majority opinion, written by Justice Abe Fortas, went on to affirm the freedom that young people have under the Constitution:

In our system, state-operated schools may not be enclaves of totalitarianism. School officials do not possess absolute authority over their students. Students… are possessed of fundamental rights which the State must respect, just as they themselves must respect their obligations to the State. In our system, students may not be regarded as closed-circuit recipients of only that which the State chooses to communicate. They may not be confined to the expression of those sentiments that are officially approved. In the absence of a specific showing of constitutionally valid reasons to regulate their speech, students are entitled to freedom of expression of their views

Explanation:

Tinker v. Des Moines is a historic Supreme Court ruling from 1969 that cemented students’ rights to free speech in public schools.

Mary Beth Tinker was a 13-year-old junior high school student in December 1965 when she and a group of students decided to wear black armbands to school to protest the war in Vietnam. The school board got wind of the protest and passed a preemptive ban. When Mary Beth arrived at school on Dec. 16, she was asked to remove the armband and was then suspended.

Four other students were suspended as well, including her brother John Tinker and Chris Eckhardt. The students were told they could not return to school until they agreed to remove their armbands. The students returned after the Christmas break without armbands, but in protest, they wore black clothing for the remainder of the school year — and filed a First Amendment lawsuit.

Represented by the ACLU, the students and their families embarked on a four-year court battle that culminated in the landmark Supreme Court decision. Dan Johnston, a young lawyer also from Des Moines and just out of law school, argued the case.

On Feb. 24, 1969, the court ruled 7-2 that students do not “shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate.”

6 0
3 years ago
Compare and contrast the U. S. and Florida constitutions, using two elements of each document (e.g., how the government is organ
Luden [163]

Answer:

using two elements of each document (e.g., how the government is organized, what rights citizens are guaranteed, how each can be amended, what powers each branch has, what the preambles say, etc.). Cite specific examples to support your statements.

6 0
3 years ago
Which constitutional issues led to the Nullification Crisis of 1832?
Wittaler [7]

Answer:

Calhoun, who opposed the federal imposition of the tariffs of 1828 and 1832 and argued that the U.S. Constitution gave states the right to block the enforcement of a federal law. In November 1832 South Carolina adopted the Ordinance of Nullification, declaring the tariffs null, void, and nonbinding in the state

Explanation:

Calhoun, who opposed the federal imposition of the tariffs of 1828 and 1832 and argued that the U.S. Constitution gave states the right to block the enforcement of a federal law. In November 1832 South Carolina adopted the Ordinance of Nullification, declaring the tariffs null, void, and nonbinding in the state

6 0
3 years ago
In this excerpt from the speech, what comparison does Churchill make to justify allowing the United Nations to raise and equip a
djyliett [7]

Churchill draws an analogy between the United Nations' efforts and those of local law enforcement authorities, saying, "Courts and judges may be set up, but they cannot operate without sheriffs and constables." This is further explained below.

<h3>Who is Churchill?</h3>

Generally, Winston Churchill, whose full name was Sir Winston Leonard Spencer Churchill, was an English statesman who was born on November 30, 1874 at Blenheim Palace and passed away on January 24, 1965.

In conclusion, Churchill compares the work of the United Nations to that of local police forces, stating, "Courts and judges may be set up, but they cannot function without sheriffs and constables."

Read more about Churchill

brainly.com/question/15678997

#SPJ1

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which place is associated with john smith
    13·1 answer
  • Which statement is not true about the national labor union
    9·1 answer
  • How does the theme of movement apply to our study of Immigration?
    12·1 answer
  • In what way did china's isolated geography contribute to its development as a country?
    7·1 answer
  • Which section of Andrew Jackson's inaugural address best proves that he supported the rights of state governments?
    13·2 answers
  • By 1900 little theater had appeared in the United states
    11·1 answer
  • Check my answers
    12·2 answers
  • Why were westerners so determined to colonize southeast asia
    11·1 answer
  • 2 In what ways did the Roman Church unify people from different cultures?​
    12·1 answer
  • Explain the process of eutrophication and its effect on a body of water
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!