1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Murljashka [212]
3 years ago
8

Which one of the following is NOT a characteristic typically associate with democracy?

History
2 answers:
Lubov Fominskaja [6]3 years ago
8 0

judging by this statemment  "It has six basic characteristics: established popular sovereignty, majority rule, individual rights, free and open elections, citizen involvement, and open compromise." I would try a

mina [271]3 years ago
4 0

<u>It has six basic characteristics: established popular sovereignty, majority rule, individual rights, free and open elections, citizen involvement, and open compromise.</u>

Hope this helps!

You might be interested in
The main goal of the Berlin Conference of 1885 was to
Zanzabum

Answer:

partiton africa

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
What conclusion could you draw about the effect that building military bases during World War I had on Texas?
svlad2 [7]
Them bases symboled like rest areas boundary lines that enimies couldnt pass
4 0
3 years ago
What caused crop failure during the Reconstruction Era?
juin [17]

Answer:

Farmers attempted to grow more and more crops and they eventually died

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
A stance that supports a particular interpretation of history is known as which of the following?
nikdorinn [45]
<span>A stance that supports a particular interpretation of history is known as B. a historical argument. This is when you choose what to believe in - history may be interpreted in many ways, and all of them can be either wrong or correct, but it is up to you to choose that analysis which you thing is the right one. That analysis will be called a historical argument, because you will provide others with arguments as to why that interpretation should be correct.</span>
5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What do you think would happen if one group of people got to make laws, enforce them, decide what the laws mean, AND judge wheth
Anuta_ua [19.1K]
It would be total chaos!! No one in a civilised society can be be “judge and jury”. There has to be a separate system for each .
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A farmer in an early civilization grows a crop surplus and shares it with his neighbors.which of the following events must have
    10·1 answer
  • John locke's idea of liberty was a main principle in the U.S. declaration of independence and?
    14·2 answers
  • Which leader was against the formation of political parties?
    12·1 answer
  • Como se llama el rey que fue encarcelado por Napoleón
    12·1 answer
  • How did 1920's literature, art, and music express the cultural conflicts facing the United States? literature, art, and music?
    13·1 answer
  • Angela is buying a dress that is on sale for 20% off. If the original price of the dress is $50.00, how much money is Angela sav
    11·2 answers
  • Which one isn’t true? Please help
    10·1 answer
  • Click to review the online content. Then answer the question(s) below, using complete sentences. Scroll down to view additional
    5·2 answers
  • DESCRIBE WHY MANY AMERICANS IN THE NORTH OPPOSED SLAVERY WHILE MOST SOUTHERNERS SUPPORTED SLAVERY... HOW DID THIS DIVIDE LEAD TO
    8·2 answers
  • The Meiji government in Japan: A. Rejected Western Enlightenment idea
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!