Answer:PepsiCo, Inc., American food and beverage company that is one of the largest in the world, with products available in more than 200 countries. It took its name in 1965 when the Pepsi-Cola Company merged with Frito-Lay, Inc. The company’s headquarters are in Purchase, New York.
The first Pepsi-Cola was created by Caleb D. Bradham (1866–1934), a pharmacist in New Bern, North Carolina. Hoping to duplicate the recent success of Coca-Cola, Bradham named his sweet cola-flavoured carbonated beverage Pepsi-Cola in 1898. The drink proved so popular that in 1902 Bradham incorporated the Pepsi-Cola Company. After many years of moderate prosperity, the company fell on hard times after World War I and was reorganized and reincorporated on several occasions in the 1920s.
In 1931 the company’s trademark and assets were picked up by Charles G. Guth (1876–1948), founder of the modern Pepsi-Cola. He established a new Pepsi-Cola Company, had a chemist formulate a better drink, set up new bottling operations, and began merchandising a hugely successful 12-ounce bottle for five cents. Guth was also president of Loft, Incorporated, a candy manufacturer and soda-fountain chain (founded 1919), and in legal battles in 1936–39 he lost controlling interest in the Pepsi-Cola Company to the new management of Loft. When in 1941 the Pepsi-Cola Company was merged into Loft, the name Loft, Inc., was changed to Pepsi-Cola Company
Answer:
Raven as a child is an important character because he creates light. - a connection back to the point Therefore, both myths show that their cultures may have valued children. - a concluding statement The Haida myth uses Raven, who takes the shape of a baby - a connection back to the point This shows the Haida myth largely depends on the work of a child. - the analysis of the evidence
Explanation:
An "analysis of evidence" is a sentence that analyzes a sentence that provides support for the general theme of the text. Literally, this type of phrase analyzes to show the sentences that were constructed as evidence.
A "connection back to the point" is a phrase that makes a reference or that returns to a previously specified or informed theme.
A "concluding statement" is a phrase that provides the conclusion of the entire text. This type of phrase usually starts with words like "however", "potanto", "especially", among others.
Out of all the pronouns, "whom" makes the most sense grammatically. This allows us to narrow it down to A or D.
In order for it to be the object of a preposition, there would have to be a preposition in front of it. "For," however is <em>not</em> a preposition. In fact, there isn't a preposition in the whole question.
This leaves us with option D, which is the correct answer.
You can better tell it's a direct object if you flip the sentence around a bit.
Your sister is waiting <em>for whom</em>?
"Whom" is essentially receiving the action. "Whom" is what your sister is waiting for.
Answer: D. whom; direct object.
Themselves
This reflexive pronoun is the best fit because it needs to agree with the antecedent--in this case "scholars". Because scholars is plural, the pronoun also needs to be plural. Themselves is a plural reflexive pronoun, so it will properly complete the sentence.
Answer/Explanation:
The two correctly cited sourxes are:
1. Bravo, Susana. "Amazonian Black Howler Monkeys: Seed Dispersers or Pests?" Biotropica, vol. 40, no. 8 (2008), pp. 71–76.; and
2. Martins, Marcel. "Pollination and Pollinators of the Amazonian Forests." Global Rainforests, vol. 19, no. 5 (2015), pp. 17–28.
These two are correct because they contain the title of the work, the title of the journal, it's volume, year of publication and the page where the work is located in the journal.
Cheers
