Answer:
It belongs to Alma because Susan abandoned it and Alma took possession of it
Explanation:
By common law, Alma is a person who has found an abandoned property and she may claim it. To do this, she has to take some definite steps to show her claim. Alma can claim this abandoned piece of chair by taking it into her house, or by placing a sign on it to show that she now owns it.
If Susan was to take this to court, the court would determine the kind of item and where it was found to determine if Alma has a right to it. But since it was found in a dump site she now has the right to it.
I would probably urge him to engage in guerrilla warfare to be more successful in his military campaigns against the American troops and to fortify his new town Prophetstown to be better prepared against attack by American forces .
Answer:
100 bushels of oranges
Explanation:
A country has comparative advantage in production if it produces at a lower opportunity cost when compared to other countries.
for Greece
opportunity cost of producing oranges = 20 / 100 = 0.2
opportunity cost of producing tomatoes = 100/ 20 = 5
For turkey
opportunity cost of producing oranges = 30 / 40 = 0.75
opportunity cost of producing tomatoes = 40 / 30 = 1.33
Greece has a comparative advantage in the production of oranges. If it specialises in the production of oranges, it would produce 100 bushels
Answer:
$10.19 per share
Explanation:
With regards to the above, the basic earnings per common share is seen below;
Preferred dividend = Shares × Par value × Shares percentage
= 5,800 × $100 × 5%
= $29,000
So, basic earning per share = (Net income - Preferred dividend) ÷ Common shares
= ($620,000 - $29,000) ÷ 58,000
= $10.19 per share
Therefore, for 2021, basic earnings per common share amounted to $10.19
Answer:
Bill is also equally and somewhere more liable as he is the employer.
Explanation:
Although in records it might seem that George did the falsify act, but for that he required the permission of his employer.
When the fact is clearly stated that George did this on direction of his employer Bill, and that Bill demanded this intentionally in order to present extra profits, he is more liable for this false act.
As George is the employee, he is bound to follow the directions of his employer. Thus Bill is crucially liable for this act, as he is an important reason for this act.