Answer:
1. to give the legislature the power to pass new laws
2. to discourage racial mixing
3. to retain public support
Explanation:
The Pearsall Plan, which was a response of the North Carolina to the ruling of the United States Supreme Court on the unconstitutionality of racial segregation in public schools.
Created in 1956, Pearsall Plan sought a moderate approach to mix their public schools, however, in the bid to achieve their goal, the plan gave reason the state (North Carolina) should amend her Constitution, to reach common ground on the issue. The following are the reasons given:
1. to give the legislature the power to pass new laws: this enable the legislature to passed legislation that delay the integration.
2. to discourage racial mixing: there is also amendment of Compulsory School Attendance Law which excused students from going to integrated schools, there by discouraging racial mixing in public schools.
3. to retain public support of school: the plan seek to give more power to the school board which in turn, helps to retain public school supports.
Thereafter, in the case of Godwin v. Johnston County Board of Education (1969), ruled the Pearsall Plan unconstitutional.
Answer: made money from plantation farming and trading of enslaved people
The Southern colonies did not make so much money from shipping. They liked slavery, they would never want it abolished. They were not so diverse, either. The answer is made money from plantation farming and trading of enslaved people.
Answer:
Science has demonstrated that the same bacterium, Yersinia yersi, caused both outbreaks, bolstering arguments that, like the Black Death, the Justinianic Plague also caused significant historical events during the period, such as the fall of the Roman Empire and the rise of Islam.
Explanation:
"Frequent battles for succession weakened the Songhai army" is the one among the following choices given in the question that <span>caused the decline of the Songhai Empire. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the third option or the penultimate option. I hope it helps you.</span>
The correct answer is <span>C. Even a period of only a few decades can greatly change the historical context surrounding an event.
It showed how fast the public opinion can change. Originally Panamanians were supportive of the canal and the policies regarding it in relations to the United States, but very soon they started disagreeing with them and wanting the United States to give the canal ownership and control back to Panama who wanted to remove itself from relations with the US.</span>
