Answer:
$163,100
Explanation:
First find the present value of cashflows at year 1 and 2
<u>PV of $82,400;</u>
PV = FV/(1+r)^n
PV = 82,400/(1.1275)^1
PV = $73082.0399
<u>PV of $148,600;</u>
PV = FV/(1+r)^n
PV = 148,600 /(1.1275)^2
PV = $116,892.2473
From the cumulative present value of 303,764.34, find the balance after deducting the above PVs;
PV of cashflow yr3 = $303,764.34 -$73082.0399 -$116,892.2473
PV of cashflow yr3 = $113,790.053
Next, calculate year 3's cashflow;
Year 3 cashflow = 113790.053(1.1275)^3
Year 3 cashflow = $163,099.996
Expected cashflow in third year is approximately $163,100
Answer:
14.82%
Explanation:
initial investment = $1,000
annual coupon = $140 (7 coupons received)
selling price = $1,090
the easiest way to determine the realized rate of return is to use a financial calculator or excel spreadsheet, and calculate the IRR: 14.82%
the cash flows are:
- -1000
- 140
- 140
- 140
- 140
- 140
- 140
- 1230
Answer:
The bond has a 2 percent coupon and a face value at issuance of $1000 which is the same with the Treasury inflation-protected bond. However, the reference Consumer Price Index (CPI) which is a measure of the average change over time in the prices paid by urban consumers for a market basket of consumer goods and services has increased from 202.34 to 203.18. From this deduction, what I know for certain about this bond is that the interest payment have increased and the coupon rate is still 2 percent.
Answer:
controlling
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that the manager is performing the management function known as controlling. This function focuses on analyzing a situation and checking for errors in order to be able to take corrective actions. Which in this scenario, by seeing that the outfield star is having a problem getting hits, the manager can now take appropriate measures to try and solve this problem.
<span>The speaker is using the fallacy of building on an unproven assumption. The speaker has made the assumption that the Japanese make the best stereo sound systems in the world. This is merely his/her opinion, and is not a proven fact. Thus, when the speaker bases another argument on that assumption, he has used a fallacy in reasoning.</span>
