1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Julli [10]
3 years ago
5

In the past, some States limited voting rights by

Social Studies
1 answer:
sp2606 [1]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Give me an example

Explanation:

You might be interested in
HELPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I WILL GIVE 25 POINTS!!!!!
Free_Kalibri [48]

Answer:

No

Explanation:

Sanctuary Cities are abhorrent at best, and the reason is simple. One could back these ideas purely on principal, but instead the state and local governments that enact these sanctuary laws are doing so with only political motivation in mind. Much like every mass shooting, or every time something bad happens in our nation. The political dilemma we face is that these acts or carried out without pure intentions.

Pandering to a base by way of violating laws sets a terrible precedent going forward. it suggests that here our laws are different and "that line in the sand can move". what is a nation of laws which doesn't enforce them. The answer is a nation without a spine. A law is a law, and while one might disagree with the laws, and that is why we have a proper way of enacting changes we want to see done in our great nation.

This has been done with Marijuana in multiple states already, however cities and local governments do not hold a vote to allow residents to have a say. No, instead they declare the city as being a sanctuary, and depend on mob rule to force those who oppose into silence or to force them out of the city entirely.

If we want to make it easier for people to attain visas and green cards, let's have that discussion and vote on it. if we want to make the US open borders, let's have a discussion and vote on it. but to simply say "to hell with you" and violate the law of the land without the say so from the citizens of state and local municipalities is mob rule at best and a violation of the oathes of offices taken by those we elect into those offices.

Personally, I believe that it is too hard for immigrants to attain visas and green cards, and that isn't to mention the financial cost ranging in the thousands for a single person going through this process. I believe this system requires change and needs revision, but it is wrong to declare sanctuary cities and states. one because it is done with motivation of pandering to a base for political gain, and lastly it sets a precedent for lawlessness in our greater country and local and state governments.

If we are to be a nation of laws, then we must be a nation of laws and not lawlessness. If we are to be a nation of suggestions, then we should carry on as we are currently doing. I love to do what feels right, but it must be done in the right way, otherwise you add fuel to the fires of division in our nation, and as Abraham Lincoln once famously stated; "A divided house cannot stand".

5 0
2 years ago
Can you give sample essay about the basic needs of human and sample essay about human desires in life?​
serg [7]

Among the many human needs, the major one is the shelter that a housing form. In modern society, the nature of the house one lives determines their lifestyle and the amount of wealth owned. However, most people prefer buying or renting homes instead of building their own.

This has therefore made rented houses to be of high value in modern society. Their basic needs are essential for the survival of human beings, regardless of where they stay. Having the basic need will make people comfortable with their living, similar to those with secondary needs.

6 0
2 years ago
99 POINT QUESTION, PLUS BRAINLIEST!!!
Maru [420]
The answer would be B!
Both presidents have the power to pass legislations, but the congress or parliament can revoke or veto those lesgislations.
5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
"Conflict never brings development." Justify the statement.​
Orlov [11]

Its true

It will never bring development because you will never have an agreement. You need to have the same purpose so you can work together and have some progress. But it can also be wrong because what if you have two teams working on different projects? Your teams have a disagreement, but both are developing different solutions to the same problem. Still developing but with a different idea. It all depends on your perspective.

8 0
1 year ago
By tradition, when does the presidential campaign begin?
qwelly [4]
B. When a candidate is officially nominated at the national convention.
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Imagine that the Buddha is going to conduct an assembly about Buddhism at your school. You have been selected to give a speech t
    7·1 answer
  • QUICK! I NEDD THIS QUICK
    13·1 answer
  • If a person were to say that all ethical beliefs of any culture should be absolutely tolerated, that would indicate that their e
    14·1 answer
  • Which agency reports data on the trends in adult obesity in the united states?
    14·1 answer
  • Goods produced by the economic system that are used as inputs in the production of future goods and services are A) consumable g
    10·1 answer
  • 2. Identify the land issues that continually cause conflict in the Middle East.
    9·2 answers
  • The<br> makes a salary of $230,700 a year.
    5·1 answer
  • How does Karen Dynan recommend readers become a part
    12·1 answer
  • Why are the rules so important to ralph what are the consequences of breaking them?
    9·1 answer
  • Disulfide bridges can be found in which level(s) of protein organization? choose all that apply.
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!