1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
klio [65]
3 years ago
8

Why was it necessary for the U.S. to take over (annex) Hawaii?

History
1 answer:
maria [59]3 years ago
8 0
It was necessary for the United States to annex Hawaii because there were few lands left to colonize. By the time the United States worked out that it might be a good idea to expand her territories, there were very few countries left to claim. Most other countries had been claimed by Great Britain, France, Spain, Portugal and Germany. It also made sense to annex Hawaii as it is relatively close to the USA. The kingdom of Hawaii was originally an independent kingdom with its own ruling monarchy. 
You might be interested in
Henry ford revolutionized the automobile industry by developing what?
Delvig [45]

Henry ford revolutionized the automobile industry by developing what?

the assembly line

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLEASE HELP ME WITH THIS. IT IS DUE SOON! <br><br>Give a summary of the constitution<br>please!
larisa [96]

Answer:

The U.S. Constitution was signed on September 17, 1787. The constitution is the supreme law of the United States of America.It was a spare document, providing few details about how the U.S. government would run itself. It explained the rough organization of the three branches(legislative, executive, and judicial), how they would interact with the states, and how the document could be amended, it contained a preamble and seven articles that describe the way the government is structured and how it operates.

Explanation:

Hope this helps:)....if not then sorry for wasting your time and may God bless you:)

8 0
2 years ago
What was life like for nobles and peasants under the economic system of manorialism?
olga_2 [115]
Under manorialism, a lord owned a plot of land which he would allow peasants and serfs to work on. Serfs would work the land of their lord, but would also have a portion of land to work themselves. Serfs would not be able to leave the manor. Lords had a lot of leisure time and were usually warriors. Hope that helps you.
4 0
3 years ago
1.what is the message this cartoonist is sharing about the cost of political campaigns and/or the need for reforms?
Solnce55 [7]

1. the cartoonist is showing that it is expensive to have a modern campaign.

2. i would agree with this cartoon because it is showing that the hand holding the politician is suggesting how much is needed to have a campaign.

5 0
3 years ago
N
Arturiano [62]

Answer:

A) Equality

Explanation:

Edge 2020

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • MARK AS BRAINIEST URGENT!!
    10·1 answer
  • How did Confucianism impact the relationship between king and subject?
    10·1 answer
  • What are the weaknesses of both Malthus’s theory and the Demographic Transition theory?
    9·1 answer
  • How did the us prepare for ww2 before pearl harbor?
    7·1 answer
  • In what ways was the united states’ involvement in the vietnam conflict an extension of its overall cold war policies?
    14·1 answer
  • After spreading throughout much of Europe in 1348, the bubonic plague killed approximately
    9·2 answers
  • Which three statements best describes urbanization?
    14·1 answer
  • Small kingdoms on the Iberian Peninsula fought to take land back from the Moors during which event?
    12·1 answer
  • Why didn’t Eastern European nations benefit from the Marshall Plan?
    13·1 answer
  • How do you think Kagan views the work of most historians today?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!