Women aren't<span> knowledgeable or educated enough to vote. </span>ladies<span> were unfit to participate </span>in the<span> male world of commerce and politics. </span>ladies<span> were naturally less intelligent than men. A woman's duty was </span>to boost<span> her </span>youngsters<span> and maintain a home. </span>
<span>Seneca Falls Convention summary: The Seneca Falls Convention was </span>the primary<span> women's rights convention </span>within u. s.<span>. </span>it had been<span> organized by </span>a few of girls United Nations agency<span> were active </span>within the termination<span> and temperance movements and </span>command July<span> 19–20, 1848, in Seneca Falls, New York.</span>
Answer:
A- Jews were considered outsiders in nation-states built around ethnic identities.
Explanation:
Jews fought for their countries (Germany, Poland, Greece...etc..), during WWl and we're loyal to their countries as well. Even though they sacrificed anything for their countries they were still imprisoned due to being 'outsiders' during WW|| and thrown in camps which in many Jews were executed.
Hope it helps!! :D
<em>The canonical explanation for how Jews survived during the Holocaust involves some form of luck. To explore and deepen an understanding of episodic moments of luck, this article presents and discusses survivor Jerry Rawicki's close calls with death during the Holocaust. The first author examines Jerry's perspective as a survivor and her own perspective as a collaborative witness to his stories, as well as how these stories fit together within the broader literature about luck and survival. She suggests possible consequences of regarding luck as the sole explanation of survival and contends that agency and luck can go hand in hand even under oppressive structural conditions, such as the Holocaust. She concludes by reflecting on why Jerry and she might understand survival differently and on the importance of considering both positions in compassionate collaborative research.</em>
Answer:
Alright lets start,
- First, based on the text will you support the bombing or not? Why?
- Second, Based on your support why or why not the U.S.A should be involved in the war?
- Lastly, one advice is to think as a high level schooler or college student. Write the letter how it affect you? How affect you community? or How this benefit or affect the nation? (ei.econimically, migration, traveling, etc)
- Make it as you are really living in the 1960s.
Explanation:
The President
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Ave
Washington D.C 20500
Dear Mr. President,
My name is ____ from _____, I currently completing my studies on ________. I write this letter to you Mr. President about my disagrement /agrement of the war taking place on North Vietnam. I had been well informed about the events that led to this event. As a U.S.A citizen I Do not support/ support the actions you as an executive is taking for the protection of our nation. Is in my believe that such actions are an unesessary/ a nessesary responce to the attack of one of the America's ship.
The vietnam war is a place were the nation must not be involved/ involved to protect the people. Communism will expand and is our duty as a nation to erradicate that polical belive that brought destruction. Participating on this war is the way to erradicate/ not erradicate comunism, as other ways that you Mr. President and the goverment block the spread to our country. One thing is for sure Mr. President, our econimy will severely damaged and that is a risk to take/ your desicion for attack during a war to protect the nation. Thank you Mr. president to take your time to read my letter.
Respectfully,
__________
Words to chose
<u>T</u><u>o</u><u> </u><u>p</u><u>u</u><u>t</u><u> </u><u>n</u><u>a</u><u>m</u><u>e</u><u> </u><u>o</u><u>r</u><u> </u><u>p</u><u>l</u><u>a</u><u>c</u><u>e</u>
Review or add things to look clean
:)
