Answer:
A person in a communal relationship with another is more likely to be concerned with the <em>non contingent </em>effect of helping. While a person in an exchange relationship with another is more likely to be concerned with the <em>contingent</em> effect of helping others.
Explanation:
<em>Communal relationships</em> are closely knitted relationships, such that occurs within family and partners. In a communal relationship, helping does not come with future expected benefits (non contingent) . Giving is done with an objective of ensuring the other person's need is met.
In an <em>Exchange relationship</em>, the effect of helping comes with future benefits of repayments. Giving is done with an objective of some future repayment. This type of relationship occurs among business partners. 'If person A does person B a favor today, it is expected that person B will repay the favor to person A in future.
Interpersonal conflict,
I hope that helped you.
Answer:
Standing to sue
Explanation:
The requirement that plaintiffs have a serious interest in a case, depending on whether they have sustained or are likely to sustain a direct and substantial injury from another party or from an action of government, is called standing to sue
This simply means legal standing to sue is about who can rightfully bring an in court, not about the issues or facts of the actual case. The standing law allows enforcement of this requirement by requiring that the party filing sue suffer an injury caused by the other party that can actually be addressed by the court.In
A).imperialism
B).colonalzation
c). direct democracy
d).represintative
Arkansas, Missouri, Iowa, Oklahoma, Kansas and Nebraska. I am pretty sure those are them. Sorry if i'm wrong