It's C
The north had the money, the people, and the industrial power to branch out the railroad networks. So following markets and money. The north built networks to the west.
The south in contrast was did not have the capacity to construct as much railroads as the north did so therefore there was less western expansion. As well the south had more interests building canals and shipping product of the states to England.
I know the 2nd and the 3rd one are correct.
Answer:
Hey mate.....
Explanation:
This is ur answer.....
<em>The Coercive Acts of 1774, known as the Intolerable Acts in the American colonies, were a series of four laws passed by the British Parliament to punish the colony of Massachusetts Bay for the Boston Tea </em><em>Party.</em>
Hope it helps!
Brainliest pls!
Follow me! :)
It depends on the situation.
The basis of appeal for Homer Plessy was that the state law that allowed for segregated rail cars for black and white passengers violated the 14th amendment of the US Constitution. More specifically, Plessy argued that this violated the Equal protection clause of the 14th amendment.
In Justice Brown's opinion, he argues that the 14th amendment is not being violated in this scenario. This is because his interpretation of the 14th amendment is that this equal protection clause applies to the legal rights of an individual, not their social rights. In other words, Plessy is legally able to ride the railcar just like any other person. Therefor, the 14th amendment is not being violated.