Answer:
Geneva Convention for the Treatment of Prisoners of War (GPW)
Explanation: The Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War was first adopted in 1929, but significantly revised at the 1949 conference.
It defines humanitarian protections for prisoners of war. There are 196 state parties to the Convention.
The President’s decision to deny the detainees prisoner-of-war (POW) status remains a point of contention, in particular with respect to members of the Taliban, with some arguing that it is based on an inaccurate interpretation of the Geneva Convention for the Treatment of Prisoners of War (GPW), which they assert requires that all combatants captured on the battlefield are entitled to be treated as POWs until an independent tribunal has determined otherwise.
The most likely tool we can use to show these details of how long the project will take and which variances exist is "Gantt chart".
<h3>What is Gantt chart?</h3>
One popular graphic representation of a project timeline is a Gantt chart. It is a kind of bar chart that displays the beginning and ending dates of a program's various components, including its resources, planning, and dependencies.
Some characteristics of Gantt chart are-
- The Gantt chart is an visual aid for planning, controlling, and keeping track of particular activities and resources within a project.
- It consist of a task list with progress bars for each activity.
- It is the project management chart that is most frequently used.
- For tasks like creating motorways, bridges, and dams, as well as for software development and creating other products and services, heavy industries employ Gantt charts.
- The chart shows which tasks can be completed concurrently and which ones must wait until others have been performed in order to be started or finished.
- It can assist in locating potential bottlenecks and locating work that might have been left off the project schedule.
To know more about the Gantt chart, here
brainly.com/question/13067654
#SPJ4
Answer:
The U.S. government made reservations the centerpiece of Indian policy around 1850, and thereafter reserves became a major bone of contention between natives and non-natives in the Pacific Northwest. However, they did not define the lives of all Indians. Many natives lived off of reservations, for example. One estimate for 1900 is that more than half of all Puget Sound Indians lived away from reservations. Many of these natives were part of families that included non-Indians and children of mixed parentage, and most worked as laborers in the non-Indian economy. They were joined by Indians who migrated seasonally away from reservations, and also from as far away as British Columbia. As Alexandra Harmon's article "Lines in Sand" makes clear, the boundaries between "Indian" and "non-Indian," and between different native groups, were fluid and difficult to fix. Reservations could not bound all Northwest Indians any more than others kinds of borders and lines could.
Through art, science, mathematics
