Question options:
reactivity
selection bias
external validity
the reliability of the measurement
Answer:
the reliability of the measurement
Explanation:
Good Observations are more reliable and valid. Professor Ibrahim's refinement to define rating scales and be sure observers(seeing how they disagree on their observations and how this could affect research) are following this ensures judgement based on data collected from these individuals(observers) are more reliable, which will ensure construct validity.
Answer:
A firm in monopolistic competition does not take full advantage of its economies of scale because it's the only oferent of a good. A firm in perfect competition produces at the lowest average cost possible.
Explanation:
C, it was at the Nuremberg trials
Answer:
The given question is incomplete; options are missing.
The missing options are:
A. valid because this conclusion is believable.
B. valid because this is indeed a valid syllogism and the logic is apparent.
C. invalid because this syllogism does not involve a pragmatic reasoning schema.
D. invalid because of the influence of the atmosphere effect.
The correct answer is option A.
Explanation:
Syllogism is a rhetorical device used to draw a conclusion about certain arguments(premise). It is a form of logical reasoning.
A syllogism can be divided into three parts:
- Minor premise
- Major Premise
- Conclusion
In the given case, the major premise is <em>"some tired people are irritable" </em>because it is stating a fact;<em> "all of the students are tired"</em> is a minor premise that is specifying a statement, and <em>"some of the students are irritable"</em> is a conclusion drawn from the major and minor premise.
This syllogism will be considered valid because the conclusion is believable.
Answer: 1. Could Tony have done otherwise than to commit his crimes?
Ans= YES.
2. Should he be held responsible for his actions?
Ans= YES.
3. Why?
Ans= Tony was brought up by his parents to the best of their abilities according to the passage. For every human being, there is always a point where you have the ability to make decisions that would determine your outcome in life, in the case of Tony he would have been opportuned to become something better but he decided to continue to tread the path which he did. If he had decided to be something else, he would have achieved it.
Lastly, according to the passage above Tony made a statement "he joked that he would return to fill out an application for the soon to be vacant manager position", this is to show he was not remorseful about his evil deed. So therefore, he should be held responsible for his actions.
Explanation:
