Answer:
This is A. copyright infringement.
Explanation:
In a case like this, it would be useful to know how much of Faye's work is actually taken from <em>Game of Thrones</em> --a real infrigement largely depends on the amount of content. However let's assume Faye took all the main plot points.
Taking the "heart" of a work and changing a few details, such as the name of the characters, is considred copyright infringement. This is also very common in music: song covers, even if they change the production or instrumentation to a certain degree, are still considered as infringing the law. To be considered Fair Use, the work must be transformative to a certain degree. This means, if Faye intented to make a parody of <em>Game of Thrones</em>, or if she simply took it as an influence and made a few references, it would be Fair Use and protected under copyright law. But that doesn't seem to be the case.
Answer:
The correct word that fills the blank is:
- The controversy that surrounded psychology after a massive replication attempt indicated that less than half of all psychology studies were replicable is often referred to by scientific journalists as the replication <u>crisis</u>.
Explanation:
in 2015, the magazine Science published a study where more than 270 investigators and scientist tried replicating <em>100 relevant scientific articles in the psychology area</em>, the results show that<u> less than 39% of the studies could be replicated</u>, this case was named by the journalists <em>"the replication crisis"</em> and show the variability of the psychologist studies.
The correct answer is letter C.
Explanation: Cultural Universals are different and similar in universal elements in all cultures.
But while culture is universal, it is also unique, there are universal elements, but each culture will differ in that respect.
Culture goes far beyond what may be similar, each people adapt their customs and have their customs as different from each person. The culture is rich, but there are also equal aspects to the differences.
Scientists should definitely use evidence - and they collect this evidence though especially designed experiments. Based on their data and assumptions they build models which they then test, but they can base their conclusions based on the models too.
What they should not do is based the conclusions on opinions, because opinions are not imparcial- they can state them as opinions, but not as conclusions.
<span />
