Answer:
This does seem like more of a topic where you have to choose what you want to do, but I'll give you my opinions on this. I think the problem with the undocumented people in this country is definitely an issue. I personally believe that the only people who should come here are people who take the time to come here legally. As a conservative, I highly supported Donald Trump's border wall, and that appeared to have handled the border crisis very well.
Many of the people coming in are criminals who are bringing in many illegal items and are posing a threat to the country. This is why I think we should just keep everyone out, and only get the people who are legal to come in. I think it would do more harm than good if we just let all these unknown people in.
In conclusion, I would support the idea of essentially just blocking these people off from even being able to enter our country, and only the people who have proved themselves to be responsible shall be granted their citizenship.
Answer:
The Japanese felt that conquering resource-rich territories would establish economic self-sufficiency and independence. They also hoped to jump-start the nation's economy in the midst of the Great Depression. Therefore, Japan set its sights on East Asia, specifically Manchuria, with its many resources.
In short, the Japanese thought that acquiring resource-rich territories would be better for their economy and prevented foreign states from blocking Japans' access to raw materials and crucial sea lanes for getting resources from other places.
Explanation:
Have a great rest of your day
#TheWizzer
3 million Germans live in sudetenland
I'll do my best.
1. Womens rights to vote and whatnot.
2. Better pay i think (for workers)
3. Better working conditions (i think)
thats best i can do sorry, maybe that can give u a start on what to look for
<span>Direct face-to-face lobbying is "the gold standard" of lobbying. Everything else is done to support the basic form. Face-to-face lobbying is considered to be the most effective because it allows the interest to directly communicate its concerns, needs, and demands directly to those who possess the power to do something politically. The lobbyist and the public official exist in a mutually symbiotic relationship. Each has something the other desperately needs. The interest seeks governmental assistance and the public official seeks political support for future elections or political issue campaigns. The environment for such lobbying discussions is usually the spaces outside the legislative chambers or perhaps the offices of the legislators. The legislative arena has characteristics that facilitate the lobbying process. It is complex and chaotic. Out of the thousands of bills that might be introduced in a legislative session, sometimes fewer than a hundred are actually passed. There is never enough time to complete the work on the agenda—not even a fraction of the work. The political process tends to be a winner-takes-all game—often a zero-sum game given the limited resources available and seemingly endless lists of demands that request some allocation of resources. Everyone in the process desperately needs information and the most frequent (and most useful) source of information is the lobbyist. The exchange is simple: the lobbyist helps out the governmental officials by providing them with information and the government official reciprocates by helping the interests gain their objectives. There is a cycle of every governmental decision-making site. At crucial times in those cycles, the needs of the officials or the lobbyists may dominate. For lobbyists in a legislative site, the crucial moments are as the session goes down to its final hours. For legislators, the closer they are to the next election, the more responsive they are to lobbyists who possess resources that may help.</span>
