<u>Answer:</u>
High P/E ratios could mean that the company has a great deal of uncertainty in its future earnings statements is true about market value ratios
<u>Explanation:</u>
Market value ratios ease estimate the economic situation of openly purchased organizations and can perform a part in identifying capitals that may be magnified, depreciated, or rated moderately. P/E ratio is estimated as the value of the share in the contemporary time toward the profits the company has proclaimed for the financial term on a per-share basis.
A firm with a great P/E ratio is usually examined to be germination properties. firms with high P/E ratios are more prone to be viewed as perilous purchases than those with cheaper ones.
Answer:
I believe it is the employees who clean and maintain pools.
Explanation: The team that installs the new pools aren't apart of the business, but are contracted into doing the pools for them. So they are not employees, which mean it isn't their service.
Answer:
$34 per hour
Explanation:
Direct labor hour
s:
= Labor cost ÷ Rate per hour
= $36,550 ÷ $17
= 2,150 Direct labor hours
Predetermined overhead rate
:
= Overhead applied on the basis of direct labor hour ÷ Number of hours
= $73,100 ÷ 2,150 hrs
= $34 per hour
Therefore, the predetermined overhead rate using the labor rate of $17 per hour is $34 per hour.
Answer:
Explanation: The recent Supreme Court decisions provides hope to those championing state sovereignty.
In National Federation of Independent Business (N.F.I.B.) v. Sebelius, a majority of the court determined that the individual mandate under the health care act exceeded Congress’s commerce clause power.
In Shelby County v. Holder, the court held that Congress unconstitutionally infringed on state sovereignty by using an outdated formula under the Voting Rights Act to decide which states had to get federal approval before changing their voting laws.
In United States v. Windsor, the court emphasized that the Defense of Marriage Act was unconstitutional in part because the regulation of domestic relations has always been left to the exclusive province of the states.
The Supreme Court has been the last arbiter of the balance between state and federal power, and that balance is dictated by the narrowest of margins. Consequently, federal politics, including the next Supreme Court appointment, may determine the scope of state sovereignty for years to come.