1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Katarina [22]
3 years ago
6

What are the weaknesses of the cash payback approach? A. It uses accrual-based accounting numbers B. It ignores the time value o

f money C. It ignores the useful life of alternative projects D. Both (B) and (C) are true
Business
1 answer:
Debora [2.8K]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

D. Both (B) and (C) are true

Explanation:

Cash payback approach is helpful to know the number of years, project would take to recover the initial investment. It could be calculated by dividing initial investment by cash flow per year. It is very simple and easy approach to compare projects and find number of years to recover the initial investment. The most serious weekness of cash payback approach is, it ignore the time value for the money, it also ignore project profitablity and project`s return on investment.  As according to cash payback approach, it consider projects with short payback time as profitable and thus ignore useful life of alternative projects.

You might be interested in
Jose Inc. reports the following balances and amounts. The following information is presented in random order (amounts are in dol
tankabanditka [31]

Answer:

Current assets        300.000,00

Current liabilites        120.000,00

WORKING CAPITAL 180.000,00

Explanation:

Working capital, also known as net working capital (NWC), is the difference between a company’s current assets, such as cash, accounts receivable (customers’ unpaid bills) and inventories of raw materials and finished goods, and its current liabilities, such as accounts payable

8 0
3 years ago
If the marginal propensity to consume is 0.75, and there is no investment accelerator or crowding out, a $115 billion increase i
rodikova [14]

Answer: $460 billion, but the effect would be larger if there were an investment accelerator.

Explanation:

If the MPC = 0.75 and there is no investment accelerator or crowding out, then a $115 billion increase in the government expenditures would result in the shift in the aggregate demand curve right by:

= $115 billion ÷ (1 - 0.75)

= $115 billion ÷ 0.25

= $115 billion × 1/0.25

= $115 billion / 0.25

= $460 billion.

Therefore, there'll be a shift in the aggregate demand curve right by $460 billion, but the effect would be larger if there were an investment accelerator

4 0
3 years ago
What is the best way to display data if you have more than 10 results?​
Yuri [45]
It would depend on the topic
Some options:
-Bar graph
-Line graph
-Pie chart
-Area chart
-Scatter chart
-Histogram
-Map
-Funnel chart
3 0
3 years ago
All of the following statements regarding accounting treatments for liabilities under U.S. GAAP and IFRS are true except:_______
mihalych1998 [28]

Answer:

A) Accounting for bonds and notes under US GAAP and IFRS is similar.

Explanation:

US GAAP and IFRS do not have the same accounting guideline for bond issue cost:

Under US GAAP, bonds payable is recorded at face value while premiums or discounts are recorded separately. While under IFRS, bonds payable is recorded using the carrying value, and amortization or premiums or discounts is done by using the effective-interest method.

5 0
3 years ago
What is the expected value when a $1 lottery ticket is bought in which the purchaser wins exactly $10 million if the ticket cont
Nadusha1986 [10]

We expect to lose $0.37 per lottery ticket

<u>Explanation:</u>

six winning numbers from = { 1, 2, 3, ....., 50}

So, the probability of winning:

P(win) = \frac{ no of favorable outcomes}{no of possible outcomes}

P(win) = \frac{1}{^5^0C_6} \\\\P (win) = \frac{6! X (50 - 6)!}{50!} \\\\P(win) = \frac{6! X 44!}{50!} \\\\P(win) = \frac{1}{15,890,700}

The probability of losing would be:

P(loss) = 1 - P(win)

P(loss) = 1 - \frac{1}{15,890,700} \\\\P(loss) = \frac{15,890,699}{15,890,700}

According to the question,

When we win, then we gain $10 million and lose the cost of the lottery ticket.

So,

$10,000,000 - 1 = $9,999,999

When we lose, then we lose the cost of the lottery ticket = $1

The expected value is the sum of the product of each possibility x with its probability P(x):

E(x) = ∑ xP(x)

= 9,999,999 X \frac{1}{15,890,700}  + ( -1 ) X \frac{15,890,699}{15,890,700} \\\\=- \frac{5,890,700}{15,890,700} \\\\= - \frac{58,907}{158,907} \\\\= - 0.37

Thus, we expect to lose $0.37 per lottery ticket

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Digitec Company has recently decided to design and manufacture a laptop that retails for under $50, in an effort to make IT avai
    7·1 answer
  • Automated Data Processing (ADP) provides computer software and services to a host of companies, including automobile dealerships
    14·1 answer
  • How does el nino affect the economies of ecuador and peru?
    10·1 answer
  • The cost of capital: a. is the price of borrowing money, which is the rate of return that borrowers must pay investors. b. tends
    8·1 answer
  • All of the following are benefits of following the ________ approach to target market selection: a strong knowledge of the segme
    10·1 answer
  • The transactions of Spade Company:
    15·2 answers
  • N sees a demonstration in a department store of a new model hair dryer that dries hair in one minute. N is most interested in th
    8·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP!
    7·2 answers
  • Preparing a stakeholder register and performing a stakeholder analysis are part of which knowledge area?
    9·1 answer
  • James used $250,000 from his savings account that paid an annual interest of 15% to purchase a hardware store. After one year, J
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!