Answer:
Lost contribution per unit = $56 per unit
Explanation:
The Division X is operating at less than full capacity, hence it has excess capacity of 600 units i.e (5000- 4,400)
This implies that it can only produce to meet the external and a portion of Division Y demand
Since Division X can only accommodate a portion of the internal demand, an opportunity would arise if it decides to meet all the request of Division Y.
Therefore, the minimum transfer price
minimum transfer price= Variable cost + a lost contribution from internal supply
The lost contribution represent the amount Division X would have made had sold the units to external buyers
Lost contribution per unit = $56 per unit
The correct words to fill in
the blank are:
<u>“social
role theory”</u>
<span>Social role theory is a perspective in
social psychology which considers men and women to act differently in social
situation and take different roles due to the expectations that society puts on
them. In this case, Karen expects women to take feminine roles.</span>
Answer:
A.1830
B.$1397.75
Explanation:
A.Gross pay
Formula for Gross pay
Gross pay = regular pay + overtime pay
= (40*30)+(14*30*1.5)
=1200+630
= $1830
Part B
B.Net pay
Formula for Net pay
Net pay = gross pay – social security tax – medicare tax – federal income tax
= 1830-(1830*6.0%)-(1830*1.5%)-295
=1830-109.8-27.45-295
= $1397.75
The product value and reputation of Nike, Inc. are being compromised by Nike Shoes.
<h3>
What is the Federal Trademark Dilution Act of 1995?</h3>
The Federal Trademark Dilution Act of 1995 amends the Trademark Act of 1946 to give the owner of a well-known mark the right to an injunction and compensation for another person's commercial use of a mark or trade name if that use starts after the mark has achieved notoriety and lessens the mark's distinctiveness.
It defines the criteria the court will use to decide whether a mark is distinctive. It restricts owners of such marks to injunctive remedies unless the person for whom the injunction is requested acted with malicious intent to exploit the owner's reputation or tarnish the mark. It offers further remedies if such intent is shown to have existed.
A person's possession of a valid registration under a specific Act or on the major register renders them completely immune from legal action taken under common or state law to protect the distinctiveness of a mark, label, or form of advertisement against them with regard to that registration.
Learn more about Federal Trademark Dilution Act of 1995 here:
brainly.com/question/15093618
#SPJ4
