What was the result of the battle of edge hill

2 answers:

5 0

Although technically a draw, Edgehill was politically a Royalist victory. Rupert's cavaliers had routed most of the Parliamentary cavalry, and the king's forces had managed to stave off a serious 11th-hour attack. Then, too, King Charles was still astride the path to London.

n200080 [17]3 years ago

5 0

The battle of edge hill ended with King Charles I resuming his march back to London, due to the fact that he was not strong enough to overcome the milita defense presented by Earl of Essex (lord fielding). He was outnumbered with 13,000 men by his side and 15,000 at hand. This result ended with the Battle of Edge hill prevented either side from gaining a victory quickly during the war due to the determination of both sides. This would let the battle of Edge hill continue as it did last, but continue for four years more.

You might be interested in

In a theocracy, the leader of the country is also the leader of the what.

ololo11 [35]

Answer:

Theocracy, government by divine guidance or by officials who are regarded as divinely guided. In many theocracies, government leaders are members of the clergy, and the state's legal system is based on religious law. Theocratic rule was typical of early civilizations.

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

Help!! I have to write 5 sentences for each on why the 1st 2nd and 6th amendment are important and how they have changed our liv

Digiron [165]

In 1st amendment which is people should have freedom of speech & no laws should be established based on religion. The United States is a free coin and we have freedom of speech so that has a lot to do with our lives today. The 2nd amendment is that security is necessary of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. This has a lot to do with today such as Polices and Swat. For the country to be safe in other words. 6th amendment has a lot to do with the jury and public trials, in all criminal prosecutions.

4 0

3 years ago

What is the senates only defense to a fillbuster

Zinaida [17]

A filibuster in the United States Senate is a strategy utilized in the United States Senate in order to keep a measure from being brought to a vote.

<u>Explanation:</u>

The most widely recognized form of delay happens when at least one congresspersons attempts to postpone or hinder a decision on a bill just by expanding banter on it.

In 1917 congresspersons embraced another standard (rule 22) at the asking of President Woodrow Wilson, which enabled the Senate to end a discussion with a 66% greater part vote (utilizing a gadget known as cloture).

3 0

3 years ago

What was rome policy toward most of th religions in the empire

noname [10]

Pretty much full religious freedom, as long the subjects worshipped Roman Gods. Jews were excused from worshipping Roman Gods.

8 0

3 years ago

In which four religions did the worlds first farmers live?

EastWind [94]

Fertile Crescent, which arcs from the Persian Gulf to Turkey and south to Egypt

8 0

3 years ago