Answer:
The correct answer is letter "D": Recommendations.
Explanation:
Evidence-based public health (EBPH) practice is the application, and assessment of effective public health programs and policies by applying scientific reasoning principles. It includes several recommendations on basic practices that should be followed to avoid future medical conditions.
Answer:
Cost Benefit Analysis
Explanation:
Cost benefit analysis research is "a systematic process for calculating and comparing benefits and costs of a project. A cost benefit analysis finds, quantifies, and adds all the positive factors (the benefits). Then it identifies, quantifies, and subtracts all the negatives (the costs). The difference between the two indicates whether the planned action is advisable."
If Karen is doing a cost benefit analysis well she must be sure she includes all the costs and all the benefits and properly quantify them in the community service program.
Reference: Worcester Polytechnic Institute. “Guides: Research Methodology: Cost Benefit Analysis.” Cost Benefit Analysis - Research Methodology - Guides at Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Oct. 2019,
Answer:
Explanation:
Opening units 0
Started 56000
56000
Transffered 30000
Closing 26000
Production Table
Using Weighted Average Method
Cost Element Complete Closing WIP Equivellant production units
Material 30,000 26,000 56,000
Labour Cost 30,000 19,500 49,500
Answer:
Specialty store
Explanation:
A specialty store is a retail business that specializes in a particular range of products and its related merchandise. A specialty store will have an extensive depth of the merchandise that its stocks. For example, a business may focus on office supplies, men clothing, or household appliances as opposed to having a wide range of consumer products.
Specialty stores will often sell their products at a premium price. They offer excellent and friendly customer service. Employees at a specialty store have in-depth knowledge about their products and will provide expert advice to customers.
Answer:
Fans might display a hindsight bias in the aftermath of a loss by claiming to have seen signs that the team would lose. Hindsight bias involves the tendency for people to perceive events that has already occurred as having been more predictable than it actually was. The fans may claim that they knew all along that the defeat was coming after such an impressive run of wins.
Some fans would blame to defeat on over confidence, citing that the team was to overconfident in their approach to the game having been a a good winning streak. They may point out that the overconfidence of the team led to them under rating their opponents which led to the defeats.
Lastly, fans might perceive the loss as the necessary outcome of a pattern (or a violation of a pattern) when, in fact, it was down to random events. The fans may claim that sooner or later the defeat would come after having one so many games in a role.
