As a result of the demand increasing only slightly compared to the reduction in price, the demand must be <u>inelastic</u>.
<h3>Why is the demand inelastic?</h3><h3 />
The demand is considered to be inelastic if the price elasticity is less than 1.
The price elasticity is:
= (%Change in quantity/% Change in price)
Solving gives:
= 15 / 200 ÷ 0.50 / 3.50
= -0.525
In conclusion, the demand for the shakes is inelastic.
Find out more on inelastic demand at brainly.com/question/1899986.
Answer:
The correct answer is: firms are unlikely to undertake investment.
Explanation:
The liquidity trap is a situation described in the Keynesian economy according to which, liquidity injections into the private banking system by the central bank do not lower interest rates or inject money into the economy and therefore do not stimulate economic growth as claimed by monetarism.
The liquidity trap occurs when people accumulate cash because they expect an adverse event, such as deflation, reduction in aggregate demand and GDP, an increase in the unemployment rate or a war. People are not buying, companies are not borrowing and banks are not lending either because they do not have enough solvency since the economic outlook is uncertain and investors do not invest because the expected returns on investments are low.
The most common characteristics of a liquidity trap are interest rates close to zero and fluctuations in the monetary base that do not translate into fluctuations in general price levels.
Answer:
$366,287.15
Explanation:
Annual salary = $32000
No. of years (n) = 30 years
Increment in salary = $600
Deposit rate = 10%
Interest rate (r) = 7% or 0.07
Growth rate (g) = Increment in salary \div annual salary
Growth rate = $600 \ $32000
Growth rate = 0.01875
First deposit = $32000 x 10% = $3200
Future worth = [First deposit \ (r - g)] x [(1 + r)n - (1 + g)n]
Future worth = [$3200 \ (0.07 - 0.01875)] x [(1 + 0.07)30 - (1 + 0.01875)30]
Future worth = [$3200 \ 0.05125] x [(1.07)30 - (1.01875)30]
Future worth = $62439.0243902 x [7.6122550423 - 1.7459373366]
Future worth = $62439.0243902 x 5.8663177057
Future worth = $366287.15
Hence, the future worth at retirement is $366,287.15
Answer:
No, he doesn't show diminishing marginal utility. Yes, he shows increasing marginal utility for Coke.
Explanation:
The law of diminishing returns states that the marginal or addition satisfaction or utility derived from the consumption of a product increase until a pint and then starts to decrease.
Units Total utility Marginal utility
1 10 10
2 25 15
3 50 25
After 3 bottles, John does not show diminishing marginal utility as the marginal utility (as shown above) continues to increase with each additional bottle of coke consumed.
