Answer: "The police were very cruel. Black Americans cannot get fair trials in court"
Explanation:
B
Explanation:
Developed in the 20th century as people began to live longer and have fewer children
Prediction for the reactivity of a chlorine directly on the double bond of an alkene would be in the following:
A dipole is created in the halogen molecule as the non-polar chlorine molecule approaches the alkene double bond.
A chloride ion is produced when the pi link in the alkene double bond breaks and establishes a bond with the delta positive Cl atom.
The chloride ion undergoes carbocation as a result, and along with the carbocation, a single electron pair forms a dative bond.
Carbon double bonds are more powerful and compact than single bonds. The number of bonds is two.
Additionally, double bonds have a lot of electrons, which could make them more reactive in the presence of a powerful electron acceptor.
To learn more about Chlorine ion here
brainly.com/question/1127028
#SPJ4
Answer:
The Caning of Charles Sumner, or the Brooks–Sumner Affair, occurred on May 22, 1856, in the United States Senate chamber, when Representative Preston Brooks, a pro-slavery Democrat from South Carolina, used a walking cane to attack Senator Charles Sumner, an abolitionist Republican from Massachusetts, in retaliation for a speech given by Sumner two days earlier in which he fiercely criticized slaveholders, including a relative of Brooks. The beating nearly killed Sumner and it contributed significantly to the country's polarization over the issue of slavery. It has been considered symbolic of the "breakdown of reasoned discourse"[1] and the use of violence that eventually led to the Civil War.
Explanation:
Answer:
It gave people the right to elect members of Parliament.
Explanation:
It could not be a democratic republic because regardless of having a Bill of Rights or not, England was a monarchial government. It could not be that the king could pass laws without Parliament’s approval because the Bill of Rights did the exact opposite; it limited the King’s power. It did not allow Roman Catholics to be kings or queens because it was never explicitly stated on the Bill of Rights. It did give the people individual rights, the rights to elect members to Parliament.
