Step-by-step explanation:
dilatation with scale factor (k) = 2
By Euler's method the <em>numerical approximate</em> solution of the <em>definite</em> integral is 4.189 648.
<h3>How to estimate a definite integral by numerical methods</h3>
In this problem we must make use of Euler's method to estimate the upper bound of a <em>definite</em> integral. Euler's method is a <em>multi-step</em> method, related to Runge-Kutta methods, used to estimate <em>integral</em> values numerically. By integral theorems of calculus we know that definite integrals are defined as follows:
∫ f(x) dx = F(b) - F(a) (1)
The steps of Euler's method are summarized below:
- Define the function seen in the statement by the label f(x₀, y₀).
- Determine the different variables by the following formulas:
xₙ₊₁ = xₙ + (n + 1) · Δx (2)
yₙ₊₁ = yₙ + Δx · f(xₙ, yₙ) (3) - Find the integral.
The table for x, f(xₙ, yₙ) and y is shown in the image attached below. By direct subtraction we find that the <em>numerical</em> approximation of the <em>definite</em> integral is:
y(4) ≈ 4.189 648 - 0
y(4) ≈ 4.189 648
By Euler's method the <em>numerical approximate</em> solution of the <em>definite</em> integral is 4.189 648.
To learn more on Euler's method: brainly.com/question/16807646
#SPJ1
To answer this question, you do 5 2/3 divided by 1/2. First, change 5 2/3 to 17/3. Then, use the reciprocal method by doing 17/3 times 2/1, which gives you 34/3. That’s 11.3 repeating, so they can make 11 whole snowmen.
When they have no solutions, the lines are parlaell, or they have the same slope but different y intercept
example
3x+2y=2 and
3x+2y=4 are paralell
also
y=3x+2 and
y=3x+4 are also parlell, no solutions
infinite solutions are when they are the same line
they have the same slope and y intercept
to find out, simplify
3x+2y=4 and
6x+4y=8 are smae lien
also
y=3x+2 and
2y=6x+4 aer the same line
1 solution is when it is none of the above things
a normal thing, where the slopes are differnet
example
y=2x+2
y=3x+2