More than 3000 children die each day due to contaminated water.
More than a quarter of children under 5 years of age die from unhealthy environments. Every year, environmental hazards - such as indoor and outdoor air pollution, secondhand smoke, unsafe water, lack of sanitation and inadequate sanitation - kill 1.7 million children under the age of 5. , according to two new WHO reports.
First report, Inheriting a Sustainable World: Atlas of Child Health and the Environment shows many of the most common causes of death among children 1 month to 5 years old - diarrhea, malaria and pneumonia – can be prevented with interventions that reduce environmental risks, such as access to clean drinking water and cooking fuels.
“A polluted environment can be deadly, especially for young children,” said Dr. Margaret Chan, WHO Director-General. "Their developing organs and immune systems, along with their smaller bodies and respiratory tracts, make them particularly vulnerable to dirty air and water."
To learn more about contaminated water from given link
brainly.com/question/18251475
#SPJ4
In a word, it was devastating. conditions were dirty and wet, physical movement was restricted for long periods of time - especially agonizing since the threat of shelling was constant and little could be done to defend oneself in such an event. not to mention disease was rampant. the fighting had reached a character of attrition. with only small, infrequent, and often undone gains, it was difficult for soldiers to feel that they were accomplishing anything, and they lost faith
<span>The Right to Life party is an example of single issue parties. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the last option or option "D". This is the type of party that mainly deals with a single issue and they do not have any other agenda to project themselves among the people.</span>
Answer: the correct answer is A. Medical Perspectve
Explanation:
Those who support a medical perspective focus on biological and physiological facts as causes of abnormal behavior, which is treated as a disease, or mental illness, and is diagnosed through symptoms and cured through treatment.
It is a matter of opinion, I suppose.
We need jurors, of course, but with so many people who hate it, there surely wouldn't be enough if the goverment simply allowed whoever wanted to volunteer to be the jury. I suppose that makes it sound like a burden, as it's a goverment-ordered requirement, like taxes. It is a privilege, though, if you think about it. Being selected for jury-duty means that you're a reliable citizen of America and you're trusted enough to help make a very important decision.
So, to restate my initial response, Jury duty can be seen as a duty or a burden, depending on how one views it.
